Case Citations

999 case law citations with propositions — what each case was cited for

Data license: Public court records

29 rows where cited_by = "Kassab" and filing_id = 59

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: court, year

cited_by 1

  • Kassab · 29 ✖
citation_id ▼ filing_id case_name citation court year proposition cited_by
682 59 59 Redwine v. Peckinpaugh 535 S.W.3d 44 Tex. App.—Tyler 2017 Trial court erred in entering judgment awarding exemplary damages when jury's verdict was not unanimous despite answering exemplary damages question Kassab
683 59 59 DeAtley v. Rodriguez 246 S.W.3d 848 Tex. App.—Dallas 2008 Trial court did not err in reforming judgment where non-unanimous verdict on liability was insufficient as a matter of law to support exemplary damages under Rule 292 Kassab
684 59 59 K3 Enter., Inc. v. Sasowski No. 20-24441-CIV-CAN, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234206 S.D. Fla. 2022 'Actual loss' under Uniform Trade Secrets Act means loss of profits, lost customers or lost market share; reputational damage is not an 'actual loss' Kassab
685 59 59 Fin. Info. Techs., LLC v. iControl Sys., USA, LLC 21 F.4th 1267 11th Cir. 2021 Understanding 'actual loss' in terms of lost profits Kassab
686 59 59 Skelectica, Inc. v. Novatus, Inc. No. 6:13-cv-1708-Orl-40TBS, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191940 M.D. Fla. 2015 'Actual loss' has been defined as 'loss of profits, lost customers or lost market share' Kassab
687 59 59 GME, Inc. v. Carter 917 P.2d 754 Idaho Supreme Court 1996 Actual loss under Idaho UTSA means lost profits, lost customers, lost market share; it would be anomalous to allow attorney fees as part of damages Kassab
688 59 59 Morgan v. Clements Fluids S. Tex., Ltd. 589 S.W.3d 177 Tex. App.—Tyler 2018 Courts should look to other states' uniform trade secret acts when interpreting TUTSA; Florida UTSA is very similar to TUTSA Kassab
689 59 59 Sw. Energy Prod. Co. v. Berry-Helfand 491 S.W.3d 699 Tex. 2016 Pre-TUTSA recoverable losses for trade secret claims include lost profits, defendant's actual profits, value a reasonable investor would pay, development costs avoided, and reasonable royalty Kassab
690 59 59 Carbo Ceramics, Inc. v. Keefe 166 F. App'x 714 5th Cir. 2006 Trade secret damages based on either value of what plaintiff lost or what defendant gained, usually measured by lost profits (applying Texas law) Kassab
691 59 59 Lacore Enters., LLC v. Angles No. 05-21-00798-CV, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 1926 Tex. App.—Dallas 2023 Attorney's fees incurred in a lawsuit are not actual damages under TUTSA Kassab
692 59 59 Martin-Simon v. Womack 68 S.W.3d 793 Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2001 Fees expended in prior litigation generally are not recoverable as damages; fees are recoverable only when an agreement between the parties so provides Kassab
693 59 59 Tana Oil & Gas Corp. v. McCall 104 S.W.3d 80 Tex. 2003 Attorney's fees for defending a different claim are not recoverable as damages as a matter of law Kassab
694 59 59 O'Neal v. Dale No. 02-20-00173-CV, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 466 Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2021 A party's claim that he incurred attorney's fees to defend against another claim is not a viable damage claim Kassab
695 59 59 Tex. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ray Ferguson Interests, Inc. No. 01-02-00807-CV, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 2001 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006 Financial loss due to time spent on litigation matters in another case was not recoverable as a matter of law Kassab
696 59 59 Woodhaven Partners Ltd. v. Shamoun & Norman, L.L.P. 422 S.W.3d 821 Tex. App.—Dallas 2014 A party relying on non-recoverable damages alone such as attorney's fees in defending a lawsuit has presented a legal barrier to any recovery Kassab
697 59 59 Naschke v. Gulf Coast Conference 187 S.W.3d 653 Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2006 Tort of another doctrine not adopted because court bound to follow existing laws not yet adopted by Legislature or Texas Supreme Court; quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 914 (1979) Kassab
698 59 59 Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. v. Nat'l Dev. & Research Corp. 299 S.W.3d 106 Tex. 2009 Texas Supreme Court did not address whether tort of another doctrine (Restatement § 914(2)) should be adopted as Texas law Kassab
699 59 59 Riner v. Neumann 353 S.W.3d 312 Tex. App.—Dallas 2011 Declined to adopt new equitable exception to the American Rule given supreme court's faithful adherence to it and strong statement in Tony Gullo that trial courts lack inherent authority to award fees contrary to the Rule Kassab
700 59 59 TOKA Gen. Contractors v. Wm. Rigg Co. No. 04-12-00474-CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 3776 Tex. App.—San Antonio 2014 Collecting cases declining to adopt tort of another doctrine Kassab
701 59 59 Per-Se Techs., Inc. v. Sybase, Inc. No. 01-03-01293-CV, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5096 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2005 Tort of another as equitable doctrine can only apply when plaintiff is wholly innocent of wrongdoing; collecting cases declining to adopt the doctrine Kassab
702 59 59 Brannan Paving GP, LLC v. Pavement Markings, Inc. 446 S.W.3d 14 Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2013 Referred to tort of another exception as an equitable exception to the general rule Kassab
703 59 59 Pacesetter Pools, Inc. v. Pierce Homes, Inc. 86 S.W.3d 827 Tex. App.—Austin 2002 Equitable principles do not allow recovery of previously incurred attorney's fees as damages where jury found plaintiff's damages caused by both parties' negligent conduct Kassab
704 59 59 Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Eldridge 742 S.W.2d 482 Tex. App.—Dallas 1987 Party who is not innocent cannot recover costs and attorney's fees as damages under tort of another Kassab
705 59 59 Crampton v. Farris 596 S.W.3d 267 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2019 Allegations of wrongdoing in connection with prosecution of disciplinary actions are absolutely immune when predicated upon filing of a grievance Kassab
706 59 59 VEST Safety Med. Servs., LLC v. Arbor Env't, LLC No. 4:20-CV-0812, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127285 S.D. Tex. 2022 Weight of authority from district courts within Fifth Circuit demonstrates conspiracy claim is preempted by TUTSA (collecting cases) Kassab
707 59 59 Firestone Steel Prods. Co. v. Barajas 927 S.W.2d 608 Tex. 1996 Civil conspiracy is an intentional tort Kassab
708 59 59 Seven Seas Petroleum, Inc. v. CIBC World Mkts. Corp. No. H-08-3048, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101112 S.D. Tex. 2013 When Legislature has chosen to impose joint and several liability rather than proportionate liability, it has clearly said so Kassab
709 59 59 Pemex Exploracion Y Produccion v. BASF Corp. No. H-10-1997, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156655 S.D. Tex. 2011 Claims for conspiracy are not expressly exempted from Chapter 33's proportionate responsibility framework Kassab
710 59 59 AssuredPartners of Or., LLC v. Reese No. 6:22-cv-00673-MC, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 233618 D. Or. 2022 Indirect misappropriation is a 'daisy-chain' type liability requiring plaintiff to show defendant knew trade secret was acquired through improper means by the disclosing party Kassab

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE citations (
    citation_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    case_name TEXT,
    citation TEXT,
    court TEXT,
    year INTEGER,
    proposition TEXT,
    cited_by TEXT
);