Case Citations

999 case law citations with propositions — what each case was cited for

Data license: Public court records

21 rows where cited_by = "Pohl" and filing_id = 15

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: court, year

cited_by 1

  • Pohl · 21 ✖
citation_id ▼ filing_id case_name citation court year proposition cited_by
69 15 15 In re Roser 2016 WL 2605686 Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016 Mandatory stay under § 51.014(b) applies to all trial court proceedings including discovery Pohl
70 15 15 In re Texas Educ. Agency 441 S.W.3d 747 Tex. App.—Austin 2014 Conducting hearings during mandatory stay was abuse of discretion violating § 51.014(b) Pohl
71 15 15 In re Bliss & Glennon, Inc. 2014 WL 50831 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014 Mandamus relief granted when trial court took action during mandatory stay under § 51.014(b) Pohl
72 15 15 Roccaforte v. Jefferson County 341 S.W.3d 919 Texas Supreme Court 2011 Trial court actions taken in violation of § 51.014(b) stay are voidable, not void Pohl
73 15 15 Bacharach v. Garcia 485 S.W.3d 600 Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016 TCPA 60-day filing period begins from service of original petition and is not reset by amended petitions Pohl
74 15 15 Wheeler v. Green 157 S.W.3d 439 Texas Supreme Court 2005 Lawyer's failure to meet a deadline is an elementary mistake that could warrant conclusion of intent or conscious indifference Pohl
75 15 15 LFMC Enterprises, LLC v. Baker 546 S.W.3d 893 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2018 Defendants bear burden of demonstrating TCPA applicability by preponderance of evidence Pohl
76 15 15 In re Lipsky 460 S.W.3d 579 Texas Supreme Court 2015 TCPA is intended to dismiss lawsuits designed to chill First Amendment rights, not dismiss meritorious lawsuits; defines prima facie case standard; 'clear' means unambiguous, sure, free from doubt; 'specific' means explicit or relating to a particular named thing Pohl
77 15 15 Wayne Dolcefino & Dolcefino Communications, LLC v. Cypress Creek EMS 540 S.W.3d 194 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2017 Two-step TCPA procedure; movant must establish connection between claims and protected conduct; evidence viewed in light most favorable to nonmovant Pohl
78 15 15 ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. v. Coleman 512 S.W.3d 895 Texas Supreme Court 2017 Two-step TCPA procedure for expediting dismissal of claims chilling First Amendment rights Pohl
79 15 15 Hersh v. Tatum 526 S.W.3d 462 Texas Supreme Court 2017 Basis of legal action determined by plaintiff's allegations, not defendant's characterizations; petition is the best and all-sufficient evidence of the nature of the action Pohl
80 15 15 Sloat v. Rathbun 513 S.W.3d 500 Tex. App.—Austin 2015 Courts should not blindly accept defendant's recharacterization of claims; should favor conclusion claims are not predicated on protected expression; activities not factual predicate for claims are not pertinent Pohl
81 15 15 Castleman v. Internet Money Ltd. 546 S.W.3d 684 Texas Supreme Court 2018 Four-part test for TCPA commercial speech exception under § 27.010(b); discusses how the 'capacity' of the person is relevant to whether they were primarily engaged in selling goods or services Pohl
82 15 15 In re E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. 136 S.W.3d 218 Texas Supreme Court 2004 Prima facie case is minimum quantum of evidence to support rational inference that allegation of fact is true Pohl
83 15 15 S & S Emergency Training Sols., Inc. v. Elliott 2018 WL 6711322 Texas Supreme Court 2018 Defining 'clear and specific' evidence requirement under TCPA Pohl
84 15 15 Hicks v. Group & Pension Administrators, Inc. 473 S.W.3d 518 Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2015 Detailed pleading allegations sufficient to establish prima facie case under TCPA Pohl
85 15 15 Prime Products, Inc. v. S.S.I. Plastics, Inc. 97 S.W.3d 631 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002 Elements of a breach of contract claim Pohl
86 15 15 Stockyards Nat. Bank v. Maples 95 S.W.2d 1300 Tex. Comm'n App. 1936 Petition is the best and all-sufficient evidence of the nature of the action Pohl
87 15 15 Sullivan v. Abraham 488 S.W.3d 294 Texas Supreme Court 2016 Movant bears burden of proof on attorney's fees including documentation of services, hourly rates, and time required Pohl
88 15 15 Stine v. Stewart 80 S.W.3d 586 Texas Supreme Court 2002 Four-year statute of limitations for breach of contract Pohl
89 15 15 Mayes v. Stewart 316 S.W.3d 715 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006 Limitations periods for civil conspiracy claims follow the underlying torts Pohl

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE citations (
    citation_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    case_name TEXT,
    citation TEXT,
    court TEXT,
    year INTEGER,
    proposition TEXT,
    cited_by TEXT
);