Legal Theories

509 claims, defenses, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses

Data license: Public court records

3 rows where filing_id = 18, party = "Kassab" and role = "defense"

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

theory_id ▼ filing_id theory party role basis
157 18 18 Evidentiary Objections — Conclusory Affidavits as No Evidence Kassab defense Conclusory affidavits do not raise fact issues and are incompetent evidence as a matter of law; statements must provide underlying facts to support conclusions; Pohl's Declaration paragraphs 4-10 all fail this standard
158 18 18 Evidentiary Objections — Hearsay Kassab defense Statements by third parties (Ladner's admissions, Precision's expressed understanding) are inadmissible hearsay under Tex. R. Evid. 801(c)
159 18 18 Evidentiary Objections — Lack of Personal Knowledge and Authentication Kassab defense Pohl was not a party to the agreement or email, was not present at execution, and provides no basis for authenticating Exhibits 1-2; affidavit must show competency under Tex. R. Civ. P. 166a(f)

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE legal_theories (
    theory_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    theory TEXT,
    party TEXT,
    role TEXT,
    basis TEXT
);