Legal Theories

509 claims, defenses, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses

Data license: Public court records

10 rows where filing_id = 21 and party = "Pohl"

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: basis

theory_id ▼ filing_id theory party role basis
177 21 21 Lack of Legal Capacity — Tex. R. Civ. P. 93(1) and 93(2) Pohl defense Kassab lacks legal capacity to sue on assigned barratry claims because such assignments (whether complete or partial) are void
178 21 21 Special Exceptions for Defective Pleading — Texas fair notice pleading standard Pohl defense Kassab's counterclaim is obscure and fails to provide fair notice of the nature, basic issues, and potentially relevant evidence of the controversy; fails to identify cause of action, assignors, or supporting facts
179 21 21 Statute of Limitations Pohl affirmative_defense Barratry claims are time-barred
180 21 21 Laches Pohl affirmative_defense Unreasonable delay in asserting claims
181 21 21 Lack of Standing Pohl affirmative_defense Kassab does not have standing to assert assigned barratry claims
182 21 21 Illegality Pohl affirmative_defense The assignments themselves are illegal/void
183 21 21 Res Judicata Pohl affirmative_defense The assigned claims may be the same claims previously asserted and adjudicated in Brumfield and Gandy cases
184 21 21 Estoppel Pohl affirmative_defense Defense to Kassab's counterclaims
185 21 21 Failure to Mitigate Pohl affirmative_defense Defense to Kassab's counterclaims
186 21 21 Waiver Pohl affirmative_defense Defense to Kassab's counterclaims

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE legal_theories (
    theory_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    theory TEXT,
    party TEXT,
    role TEXT,
    basis TEXT
);