home / kassab_analytics

Menu
  • Search all tables

Legal Theories

509 claims, defenses, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses

Data license: Public court records

8 rows where filing_id = 30 and party = "Kassab"

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

role 1

  • defense 8

party 1

  • Kassab · 8 ✖
theory_id ▼ filing_id theory party role basis
240 30 30 Immunity Under Rule 17.09 of Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure Kassab defense Absolute and unqualified immunity for lawsuits predicated upon the filing of a grievance or participation in the attorney disciplinary system. Pohl admits claims are predicated on grievance filing.
241 30 30 Judicial Proceedings Privilege Kassab defense Absolute privilege covering statements in judicial proceedings and communications preliminary to proposed proceedings. Extends beyond defamation when damages flow from litigation communications. Covers pre-suit solicitation letters and barratry litigation.
242 30 30 Attorney Immunity (Youngkin / Taylor v. Tolbert) Kassab defense Attorney immune from liability to nonclients for conduct within scope of representation, even if alleged criminal or wrongful. TUTSA does not expressly abrogate the defense. Taylor (2022) requires reconsideration of court's prior denial.
243 30 30 Statute of Limitations (TUTSA 3-year; Conversion 2-year; Conspiracy derivative) Kassab defense Misappropriation discovered by Pohl no later than July 2014; alternatively May 2015 letters. Suit filed August 28, 2018. TUTSA expressly precludes continuing tort theories (§ 16.010(b)). Subsequent use/sale does not restart clock. Conspiracy shares accrual of underlying tort.
244 30 30 Conclusive Negation — No Trade Secret (Failure to Maintain Secrecy) Kassab defense Pohl failed to take reasonable measures to keep information secret — no confidentiality agreements with runners, information freely shared, no protective measures despite knowing of dissemination. Incorporates Nicholson Motion.
245 30 30 Conclusive Negation — No Ownership Kassab defense Client files are property of clients under Texas law (In re McCann, In re George). Marketing lists belonged to Precision as its work product (Favre testimony). TUTSA requires ownership (Title Source v. HouseCanary). Conversion requires title or right of possession (Catania).
246 30 30 Unlawful Acts Rule / Illegality Bar Kassab defense Texas public policy prohibits recovery for damages inextricably intertwined with illegal acts. Pohl committed barratry (third-degree felony) and unauthorized practice of law in Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, and Florida. Cannot prove ownership or damages without referencing illegal activity.
247 30 30 Improper Damages — American Rule on Attorney's Fees Kassab defense Attorney's fees from prior litigation not recoverable as damages absent statute or contract (Tony Gullo Motors). Texas Supreme Court has not adopted 'tort of another' exception. Even if exception existed, Pohl is not wholly innocent. TUTSA damages limited to lost profits, unjust enrichment, reasonable royalty.

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE legal_theories (
    theory_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    theory TEXT,
    party TEXT,
    role TEXT,
    basis TEXT
);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 6.507ms · Data license: Public court records