Legal Theories

509 claims, defenses, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses

Data license: Public court records

5 rows where filing_id = 31, party = "Kassab" and role = "affirmative_defense"

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

theory_id ▼ filing_id theory party role basis
248 31 31 Judicial Immunity (NEW — #16) Kassab affirmative_defense Immunity for conduct in judicial proceedings
249 31 31 Immunity under Rule 17.09 of the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure (NEW — #17) Kassab affirmative_defense Absolute and unqualified immunity for lawsuits predicated upon the filing of a grievance or participation in the attorney disciplinary system
250 31 31 Illegality/Criminal Acts/Unlawful Acts Rule (EXPANDED — #13) Kassab affirmative_defense If at the time of injury the plaintiff was engaged in an illegal act that contributed to the injury, he may not recover; Pohl's barratry and UPL bar recovery
251 31 31 TUTSA Preemption (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 134A.007(a)) (#23) Kassab affirmative_defense TUTSA displaces conflicting common-law tort claims based on trade secret misappropriation
254 31 31 20 Remaining Affirmative Defenses (carried from prior answers) Kassab affirmative_defense Statute of limitations, justification, estoppel, waiver, ratification, release, unclean hands, contribution, failure to mitigate, lack of standing, accord and satisfaction, assumption of risk, First Amendment, attorney immunity, in pari delicto, res judicata, defect of parties, abandonment, subject of a valid contract

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE legal_theories (
    theory_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    theory TEXT,
    party TEXT,
    role TEXT,
    basis TEXT
);