Legal Theories

509 claims, defenses, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses

Data license: Public court records

2 rows where filing_id = 38 and party = "Pohl"

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

theory_id ▼ filing_id theory party role basis
290 38 38 Future damages do not justify abatement (rebuttal) Pohl claim Texas law requires parties to bring claims even when all damages have not occurred (Schlumberger v. Pasko); future damages assessed by reasonable probability standard (GTE Mobilnet v. Pascouet)
291 38 38 Unlawful Acts Doctrine preemption (rebuttal) Pohl claim Texas Supreme Court in Dugger v. Arredondo held the doctrine is 'no longer a viable defense' under § 33.003; confirmed in Boerjan v. Rodriguez; Kassab himself acknowledged this in Beatty v. Knighton

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE legal_theories (
    theory_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    theory TEXT,
    party TEXT,
    role TEXT,
    basis TEXT
);