Legal Theories
Data license: Public court records
4 rows where filing_id = 40 and party = "Kassab/Nicholson"
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
| theory_id ▼ | filing_id | theory | party | role | basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 293 | 40 40 | Evidentiary insufficiency after objections sustained | Kassab/Nicholson | defense | If objections to Pohl Declaration are sustained and objectionable evidence struck, Pohl has no competent evidence to support claims |
| 294 | 40 40 | Interested-witness testimony standard | Kassab/Nicholson | defense | Under Rule 166a(c), interested-witness testimony must be 'clear, positive and direct' — Pohl's vague references to 'Precision' without identifying individuals fail this standard |
| 295 | 40 40 | Grievance proceedings not res judicata | Kassab/Nicholson | defense | Dismissal of disciplinary grievance does not preclude civil claims based on same conduct (Charles v. Diggs; Tex. R. Disc. P. 17.03) |
| 296 | 40 40 | Rule of Optional Completeness | Kassab/Nicholson | defense | Under Rule 107, defendants entitled to introduce complete depositions when Pohl attached only portions, to allow court to fully understand testimony |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE legal_theories (
theory_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
theory TEXT,
party TEXT,
role TEXT,
basis TEXT
);