home / kassab_analytics

Menu
  • Search all tables

Legal Theories

509 claims, defenses, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses

Data license: Public court records

2 rows where filing_id = 53, party = "Pohl" and role = "opposition"

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

role 1

  • opposition · 2 ✖

party 1

  • Pohl · 2 ✖
theory_id ▼ filing_id theory party role basis
382 53 53 Prohibition of leading questions on direct examination under Tex. R. Evid. 611(c) Pohl opposition Leading questions should not be used on direct examination; exception for hostile/adverse witnesses requires a showing Kassab has not made. Favre has been aligned with Kassab throughout the case.
384 53 53 Form objections to DWQ questions are proper on their face Pohl opposition Evidence is not always necessary to support form objections (In re Union Pac.). Questions with typos, vagueness, lack of temporal scope, and calls for speculation are facially objectionable.

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE legal_theories (
    theory_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    theory TEXT,
    party TEXT,
    role TEXT,
    basis TEXT
);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 6.126ms · Data license: Public court records