Legal Theories
Data license: Public court records
2 rows where filing_id = 53, party = "Pohl" and role = "opposition"
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
| theory_id ▼ | filing_id | theory | party | role | basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 382 | 53 53 | Prohibition of leading questions on direct examination under Tex. R. Evid. 611(c) | Pohl | opposition | Leading questions should not be used on direct examination; exception for hostile/adverse witnesses requires a showing Kassab has not made. Favre has been aligned with Kassab throughout the case. |
| 384 | 53 53 | Form objections to DWQ questions are proper on their face | Pohl | opposition | Evidence is not always necessary to support form objections (In re Union Pac.). Questions with typos, vagueness, lack of temporal scope, and calls for speculation are facially objectionable. |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE legal_theories (
theory_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
theory TEXT,
party TEXT,
role TEXT,
basis TEXT
);