home / kassab_analytics

Menu
  • Search all tables

Legal Theories

509 claims, defenses, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses

Data license: Public court records

8 rows where filing_id = 68 and role = "claim"

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

role 1

  • claim · 8 ✖

party 1

  • Pohl 8
theory_id ▼ filing_id theory party role basis
502 68 68 Presumption jury followed unanimity instructions (Columbia Rio Grande, Bruce, Stover) Pohl claim Jury instructed to only answer Q17 'Yes' if unanimous and to only answer Q19 if unanimous on Q17; jury's affirmative answers demonstrate unanimity
503 68 68 Harmonization of jury findings (Menchaca, Bender, Luna, Jackson) Pohl claim Court must reasonably construe jury findings to harmonize them; failure to do so is reversible error
504 68 68 Waiver of alleged verdict conflict (Menchaca, Burbage, Fleet, R. 295) Pohl claim Kassab failed to object before jury discharged; party relying on conflicting answers bears burden to timely object
505 68 68 TUTSA actual loss encompasses consequential damages including separate-proceeding attorney fees Pohl claim Broad plain meaning of 'actual loss'; flexible and imaginative approach (Sw. Energy); distinguished from same-lawsuit fees; Akin Gump permits recovery
506 68 68 Tort of another doctrine (Dixon Fin. Servs.) Pohl claim Equitable recovery of attorney fees when party required to defend prior action as consequence of wrongful act; no wholly innocent party element (Naschke, Brannan Paving)
507 68 68 TUTSA authorizes both actual loss and unjust enrichment (§ 134A.004(a)) Pohl claim Statute expressly permits both; market value = forward loss, development costs = past unjust enrichment; not duplicative because unjust enrichment disgorges gains rather than compensating loss
508 68 68 Conspiracy as rule of vicarious liability, not preempted (Agear Corp.) Pohl claim Not independent tort but rule of joint liability; Chapter 33 doesn't supersede (Guillory, Stephens); no conflicting remedy — merely makes TUTSA damages joint and several
509 68 68 Pohl is prevailing party entitled to TUTSA attorney fees (§ 134A.005) Pohl claim Actual damages over $1.4M greatly exceed $765K settlement credit

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE legal_theories (
    theory_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    theory TEXT,
    party TEXT,
    role TEXT,
    basis TEXT
);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 5.315ms · Data license: Public court records