Legal Theories
Data license: Public court records
3 rows where filing_id = 7 and role = "affirmative_defense"
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
| theory_id ▼ | filing_id | theory | party | role | basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59 | 7 7 | Attorney Immunity Doctrine (Cantey Hanger, LLP v. Byrd) | Kassab | affirmative_defense | All complained-of conduct — obtaining client information, filing lawsuits, filing grievances — falls within the scope of client representation; Highland Capital directly analogous |
| 60 | 7 7 | Statute of Limitations (Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 16.003, 16.010) | Kassab | affirmative_defense | Pohl knew of his claims in 2014 (moved from Gulfport office, learned from secretary clients were diverted, Mississippi Litigation discovery began October 2014) but did not file until August 2018, exceeding the 2-year conversion/conspiracy and 3-year TUTSA limitations periods |
| 61 | 7 7 | Res Judicata / Claims Preclusion | Kassab | affirmative_defense | Pohl sued Precision Marketing for conversion, fraud, and unjust enrichment in the Mississippi Litigation based on the same transactions; settled with prejudice on April 21, 2017 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE legal_theories (
theory_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
theory TEXT,
party TEXT,
role TEXT,
basis TEXT
);