appellate_issue_id,filing_id,point_of_error,standard_of_review
1,66,Newly discovered evidence of witness tampering — Walker 30% confession,Abuse of discretion
2,66,Factual insufficiency — Q1 trade secret ownership,Factual sufficiency
3,66,Jury charge error — Q2 broad-form with unpled theories (Crown Life/Casteel),Abuse of discretion / harmful error
4,66,Factual insufficiency — Q2 misappropriation,Factual sufficiency
5,66,Jury charge error — Q3 wrongful conduct untied to charge,Abuse of discretion
6,66,Jury charge error — refusal of proportionate responsibility question,Abuse of discretion
7,66,Jury charge error — Q5 limitations with 'by Kassab' language,Abuse of discretion
8,66,"Factual insufficiency — Q5 answer (August 19, 2017 date)",Factual sufficiency
9,66,Refusal to submit unlawful acts defense (Proposed Q6),Abuse of discretion
10,66,Refusal to submit immunity/privilege defense (Proposed Q8),Abuse of discretion
11,66,Exclusion of barratry expert testimony,Abuse of discretion
12,66,Jury charge error — Q6 'in an attorney client relationship' as comment on weight of evidence,Abuse of discretion
13,66,Factual insufficiency — Q6 attorney-client relationship,Factual sufficiency
14,66,Jury charge error — Q7(1) attorney fees not TUTSA damages,Abuse of discretion / legal error
15,66,Evidentiary error — property owner rule inapplicable to trade secret valuation,Abuse of discretion
16,66,Factual insufficiency — Q7(2) and Q7(3) damages,Factual sufficiency
17,66,Factual insufficiency — Q8/Q17 willful and malicious,Clear and convincing evidence standard
18,66,Factual insufficiency — Q19 exemplary damages ($3M),Factual sufficiency
19,66,Jury charge error — Q15 conspiracy preempted by TUTSA,Legal error
20,66,Denial of responsible third party designations,Abuse of discretion
21,66,Denial of motion to abate pending Cheatham v. Pohl,Abuse of discretion
22,66,Denial of motion to compel under offensive use doctrine,Abuse of discretion
23,66,Dismissal of Kassab's civil barratry counterclaims on summary judgment,De novo
24,66,Insufficiency of attorney fees evidence — conclusory testimony and redacted invoices,Factual sufficiency