home / kassab_analytics

Menu
  • Search all tables

Appellate Issues

24 points of error raised on appeal

Data license: Public court records

24 rows where filing_id = 66

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: standard_of_review

appellate_issue_id ▼ filing_id point_of_error standard_of_review
1 66 66 Newly discovered evidence of witness tampering — Walker 30% confession Abuse of discretion
2 66 66 Factual insufficiency — Q1 trade secret ownership Factual sufficiency
3 66 66 Jury charge error — Q2 broad-form with unpled theories (Crown Life/Casteel) Abuse of discretion / harmful error
4 66 66 Factual insufficiency — Q2 misappropriation Factual sufficiency
5 66 66 Jury charge error — Q3 wrongful conduct untied to charge Abuse of discretion
6 66 66 Jury charge error — refusal of proportionate responsibility question Abuse of discretion
7 66 66 Jury charge error — Q5 limitations with 'by Kassab' language Abuse of discretion
8 66 66 Factual insufficiency — Q5 answer (August 19, 2017 date) Factual sufficiency
9 66 66 Refusal to submit unlawful acts defense (Proposed Q6) Abuse of discretion
10 66 66 Refusal to submit immunity/privilege defense (Proposed Q8) Abuse of discretion
11 66 66 Exclusion of barratry expert testimony Abuse of discretion
12 66 66 Jury charge error — Q6 'in an attorney client relationship' as comment on weight of evidence Abuse of discretion
13 66 66 Factual insufficiency — Q6 attorney-client relationship Factual sufficiency
14 66 66 Jury charge error — Q7(1) attorney fees not TUTSA damages Abuse of discretion / legal error
15 66 66 Evidentiary error — property owner rule inapplicable to trade secret valuation Abuse of discretion
16 66 66 Factual insufficiency — Q7(2) and Q7(3) damages Factual sufficiency
17 66 66 Factual insufficiency — Q8/Q17 willful and malicious Clear and convincing evidence standard
18 66 66 Factual insufficiency — Q19 exemplary damages ($3M) Factual sufficiency
19 66 66 Jury charge error — Q15 conspiracy preempted by TUTSA Legal error
20 66 66 Denial of responsible third party designations Abuse of discretion
21 66 66 Denial of motion to abate pending Cheatham v. Pohl Abuse of discretion
22 66 66 Denial of motion to compel under offensive use doctrine Abuse of discretion
23 66 66 Dismissal of Kassab's civil barratry counterclaims on summary judgment De novo
24 66 66 Insufficiency of attorney fees evidence — conclusory testimony and redacted invoices Factual sufficiency

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE appellate_issues (
    appellate_issue_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    point_of_error TEXT,
    standard_of_review TEXT
);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 4.564ms · Data license: Public court records