citation_id,filing_id,case_name,citation,court,year,proposition,cited_by
90,16,Walker v. Williamson,2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61185,S.D. Miss.,2016,"Background of the Federal Court Case involving Pohl, Precision, Walker, and Ladner",Kassab
91,16,Walker v. Williamson,2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59031,S.D. Miss.,2017,Runners contracted with Pohl to provide marketing services for automobile rollover claims,Kassab
92,16,Walker v. Williamson,2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76488,S.D. Miss.,2016,Runners procured thousands of BP claims and motor vehicle cases but Pohl did not pay agreed share,Kassab
93,16,Kassab v. Pohl,612 S.W.3d 571,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2020,First Court of Appeals opinion characterizing Pohl's claims and Kassab's conduct; Runners paid over $5 million in 'barratry pass-through money'; Kassab's conduct arose from commercial transaction involving legal services; intended audience were potential clients with barratry claims,Kassab
94,16,Tex. Dep't of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda,133 S.W.3d 217,Texas Supreme Court,2004,Purpose of summary judgment is to eliminate patently unmeritorious claims,Kassab
95,16,"Lujan v. Navistar, Inc.",555 S.W.3d 79,Texas Supreme Court,2018,Traditional summary judgment standard — no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law,Kassab
96,16,Maldonado v. Maldonado,556 S.W.3d 407,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2018,Burden shifts to nonmovant to raise genuine issue of material fact,Kassab
97,16,Ford Motor Co. v. Ridgway,135 S.W.3d 598,Texas Supreme Court,2004,Genuine issue of material fact exists if more than a scintilla of evidence is produced,Kassab
98,16,Schlumberger Tech. Corp. v. Pasko,544 S.W.3d 830,Texas Supreme Court,2018,Defendant moving for summary judgment on limitations must conclusively establish the defense elements; cause of action accrues when tortious act was committed or facts authorize seeking judicial remedy,Kassab
99,16,KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison Cnty. Hous. Fin. Corp.,988 S.W.2d 746,Texas Supreme Court,1999,Defendant must conclusively prove when cause of action accrued and negate discovery rule,Kassab
100,16,"United Healthcare Servs., Inc. v. First St. Hosp. LP",570 S.W.3d 323,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2018,"Cause of action accrues when tortious act was committed and caused injury, or facts come into existence authorizing judicial remedy",Kassab
101,16,Provident Life & Acc. Ins. Co. v. Knott,128 S.W.3d 211,Texas Supreme Court,2003,Determining accrual date is a question of law,Kassab
102,16,Burns v. Rochon,190 S.W.3d 263,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2006,Statute of limitations for conversion is two years from date property is allegedly taken,Kassab
103,16,"Agar Corp., Inc. v. Electro Circuits Int'l, LLC",580 S.W.3d 136,Texas Supreme Court,2019,Civil conspiracy limitations follows underlying claims; trade secret and conspiracy claims barred when injury from sale was known more than three years before suit,Kassab
104,16,Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co.,348 S.W.3d 194,Texas Supreme Court,2011,"Statute of limitations begins running upon actual knowledge of wrongful injury, even without knowing specific cause, responsible party, full extent, or chances of avoidance",Kassab
105,16,"Comput. Assocs. Int'l Inc. v. Altai, Inc.",918 S.W.2d 453,Texas Supreme Court,1996,Plaintiff need not know he has a cause of action; must only know facts giving rise to the cause of action,Kassab
106,16,Sw. Energy Prod. Co. v. Berry-Helfand,491 S.W.3d 699,Texas Supreme Court,2016,Trade secret limitations begins when plaintiff should have known facts leading to discovery of misappropriation through reasonable diligence,Kassab
107,16,Tavana v. GTE Sw.,1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 5365,Tex. App.—Dallas,1999,Suit for trade secret misappropriation barred when plaintiff knew trade secrets had been misappropriated,Kassab
108,16,"Target Strike, Inc. v. Marston & Marston Inc.",524 F. App'x 939,5th Cir.,2013,Trade secret claim barred when defendant's conduct led plaintiff to believe confidential information had been misappropriated,Kassab
109,16,Barr v. Resolution Tr. Corp.,837 S.W.2d 627,Texas Supreme Court,1992,Res judicata prevents relitigation of claims finally adjudicated and related matters that should have been litigated in prior suit; subsequent suit barred if arising from same subject matter,Kassab
110,16,Travelers Ins. Co. v. Joachim,315 S.W.3d 860,Texas Supreme Court,2010,"Three elements of res judicata: prior final judgment, identity of parties or those in privity, same claims as raised or could have been raised",Kassab
111,16,"Palaxar Grp., LLC v. Williams",2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138533,M.D. Fla.,2014,Conspirators deemed to be in privity for res judicata purposes,Kassab
112,16,Seenyur v. Coolidge,2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5895,D. Minn.,2018,Members of a conspiracy are deemed under the law to be in privity with each other,Kassab
113,16,RSM Prod. Corp. v. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP,800 F. Supp. 2d 182,D.D.C.,2011,Conspirators deemed in privity for res judicata purposes,Kassab
114,16,Madera Production Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.,107 S.W.3d 652,Tex. App.—Texarkana,2003,Failure to add new parties to prior federal proceeding involving similar subject matter cannot be remedied by subsequent state court action,Kassab
115,16,Holloway v. Starnes,840 S.W.2d 14,Tex. App.—Dallas,1992,Res judicata summary judgment affirmed when factual allegations from prior litigation used to support new conspiracy lawsuit,Kassab
116,16,Youngkin v. Hines,546 S.W.3d 675,Texas Supreme Court,2018,"Attorney is immune from liability to nonclients for conduct within scope of representation; inquiry focuses on kind of conduct, not alleged wrongfulness; acquisition of clients and filing lawsuits are protected actions facilitating legal services",Kassab
117,16,"Cantey Hanger, LLP v. Byrd",467 S.W.3d 477,Texas Supreme Court,2015,Attorney conduct may be wrongful but still fall within scope of client representation; immunity not limited to litigation context; conduct after litigation ended still protected,Kassab
118,16,"Bethel v. Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Winslett & Moser, P.C.",595 S.W.3d 651,Texas Supreme Court,2020,Criminal conduct is not categorically excepted from attorney civil immunity when connected with representing a client,Kassab
119,16,"Highland Capital Mgmt., LP v. Looper Reed & McGraw, P.C.",2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 442,Tex. App.—Dallas,2016,Claims for illegal acquisition and use of stolen proprietary information dismissed on attorney immunity when conduct fell within scope of representation in the lawsuit; characterizing conduct as fraudulent or wrongful is immaterial to immunity evaluation,Kassab
120,16,"Haynes & Boone, LLP v. NFTD, LLC",2021 Tex. LEXIS 423,Texas Supreme Court,2021,Attorney immunity applies to claims based on conduct outside the litigation context,Kassab
121,16,"Santiago v. Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, P.C.",2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 2092,Tex. App.—Dallas,2017,Texas courts have noted attorney immunity applies outside of the litigation context,Kassab
122,16,Sacks v. Hall,2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 12570,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2014,Attorney not liable for filing confidential medical records because it did not constitute action foreign to duties of an attorney,Kassab
123,16,Bradt v. West,892 S.W.2d 56,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],1992,Attorney does not have a right of recovery against another attorney arising from conduct engaged in as part of discharge of duties representing a party,Kassab