citation_id,filing_id,case_name,citation,court,year,proposition,cited_by
261,30,Kassab v. Pohl,"612 S.W.3d 571, 574, 578-79",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2020,Characterizes case; describes barratry scheme; opined Kassab's conduct arose from commercial transaction involving legal services,Kassab
262,30,Brumfield v. Williamson,634 S.W.3d 170,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2021,One of four barratry lawsuits; dismissed on limitations,Kassab
263,30,Gandy v. Williamson,"634 S.W.3d 214, 219",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2021,Another barratry lawsuit; dismissed on limitations,Kassab
264,30,Cheatham v. Pohl,"No. 01-20-00046-CV, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 649",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2022,Reversed dismissal; found more than scintilla of evidence of barratry scheme,Kassab
265,30,Lockett v. HB Zachry Co.,"285 S.W.3d 63, 72",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2009,Adoption of co-party's MSJ as procedurally legitimate practice,Kassab
266,30,Walker v. Williamson,"No. 1:14cv381-KS-JCG, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61185; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76488; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59031",S.D. Miss.,2016,Mississippi Litigation — runners sued Pohl for breach of contract regarding solicitation fee arrangements,Kassab
267,30,Crampton v. Farris,"596 S.W.3d 267, 274-76",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2019,Allegations of wrongdoing in connection with prosecution of disciplinary actions are absolutely immune under Rule 17.09,Kassab
268,30,Burch v. State Bar of Tex.,"No. 07-19-00224-CV, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 1409",Tex. App.—Amarillo,2020,Rule 17.09 immunity barred claim related to grievance proceeding,Kassab
269,30,"Landry's, Inc. v. Animal Legal Def. Fund","631 S.W.3d 40, 46, 48-50",Tex. Supreme Court,2021,Judicial proceedings privilege is absolute; attaches to all aspects of proceedings; extends to communications preliminary to proposed proceedings; protects communications necessary to set judicial machinery in motion,Kassab
270,30,Crain v. Smith,"22 S.W.3d 58, 62-63",Tex. App.—Corpus Christi,2000,Pre-suit letters protected by judicial proceedings privilege,Kassab
271,30,Laub v. Pesikoff,"979 S.W.2d 686, 691",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],1998,Privilege extends beyond defamation when essence of claim is damages flowing from judicial proceeding communications,Kassab
272,30,"Tex. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ray Ferguson Interests, Inc.","No. 01-02-00807-CV, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 2001",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2006,Absolute privilege applied in deceptive practices claim because theory of damages was based on allegations in judicial proceeding,Kassab
273,30,Bradt v. West,"892 S.W.2d 56, 72",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],1992,Attorney has no right of recovery against another attorney arising from conduct in discharge of duties representing a party,Kassab
274,30,Youngkin v. Hines,"546 S.W.3d 675, 681-82",Tex. Supreme Court,2018,"Attorney immune from liability to nonclients for conduct within scope of representation; inquiry focuses on kind of conduct, not alleged wrongfulness",Kassab
275,30,Taylor v. Tolbert,"644 S.W.3d 637, 642, 648-49",Tex. Supreme Court,2022,Even conduct prohibited by statute subject to attorney immunity if statute does not expressly abrogate the defense,Kassab
276,30,"Bethel v. Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Winslett & Moser, P.C.","595 S.W.3d 651, 657",Tex. Supreme Court,2020,Criminal conduct not categorically excepted from attorney civil immunity when connected with client representation,Kassab
277,30,"Cantey Hanger, LLP v. Byrd","467 S.W.3d 477, 483, 485",Tex. Supreme Court,2015,Attorney conduct may be wrongful but still within scope of representation; immunity applies to post-litigation conduct,Kassab
278,30,"Haynes & Boone, LLP v. NFTD, LLC","631 S.W.3d 65, 78-79, 81",Tex. Supreme Court,2021,"Attorney immunity applies to claims based on conduct outside litigation context, including business transactions",Kassab
279,30,"Clayton v. Oldcastle Materials Tex., Inc.","No. 09-18-00063-CV, 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 1112",Tex. App.—Beaumont,2019,Attorney immunity applied to selling legal services and subsequent client representation,Kassab
280,30,"Highland Capital Mgmt., LP v. Looper Reed & McGraw, P.C.","No. 05-15-00055-CV, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 442",Tex. App.—Dallas,2016,Attorney immunity applied to claims of illegal acquisition of stolen proprietary information,Kassab
281,30,Schlumberger Tech. Corp. v. Pasko,"544 S.W.3d 830, 833-34",Tex. Supreme Court,2018,Defendant moving on limitations must conclusively establish elements; true even if all resulting damages have not yet occurred,Kassab
282,30,KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison Cnty. Hous. Fin. Corp.,"988 S.W.2d 746, 748",Tex. Supreme Court,1999,Must conclusively prove when cause of action accrued and negate discovery rule,Kassab
283,30,"United Healthcare Servs., Inc. v. First St. Hosp. LP","570 S.W.3d 323, 335",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2018,"Cause of action accrues when tortious act committed and caused injury, or facts authorize seeking judicial remedy",Kassab
284,30,Provident Life & Acc. Ins. Co. v. Knott,"128 S.W.3d 211, 221",Tex. Supreme Court,2003,Determining accrual date is a question of law,Kassab
285,30,Gen. Universal Sys. v. HAL Inc.,"500 F.3d 444, 451",5th Cir.,2007,TUTSA explicitly precludes treating trade secret misappropriation as continuing tort,Kassab
286,30,"Guajardo v. Freddie Records, Inc.","No. CV H-10-02024, 2014 WL 12603179",S.D. Tex.,2014,Texas Legislature decided not to make trade secret misappropriation a continuing tort,Kassab
287,30,"Bianco v. Globus Med., Inc.","53 F. Supp. 3d 929, 938",E.D. Tex.,2014,Tort of misappropriation occurs at the moment of misappropriation under Texas law,Kassab
288,30,"Agar Corp. v. Electro Circuits Int'l, LLC","565 S.W.3d 12, 19-21",Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2016,Subsequent sale of misappropriated trade secrets does not restart TUTSA limitations,Kassab
289,30,"Agar Corp., Inc. v. Electro Circuits Int'l, LLC","580 S.W.3d 136, 138, 144",Tex. Supreme Court,2019,Civil conspiracy shares both accrual and limitations period of underlying wrong,Kassab
290,30,"Wells Fargo Bank Nw. v. RPK Capital XVI, L.L.C.","360 S.W.3d 691, 700",Tex. App.—Dallas,2012,Conversion limitations begin at time of unlawful taking,Kassab
291,30,In re McCann,"422 S.W.3d 701, 704-705",Tex. Crim. App.,2013,Texas Supreme Court recognized client owns contents of his or her file; attorney is agent of client,Kassab
292,30,In re George,"28 S.W.3d 511, 516",Tex. Supreme Court,2000,Work product generated by attorney in representing client belongs to the client,Kassab
293,30,"Title Source, Inc. v. HouseCanary, Inc.","612 S.W.3d 517, 527",Tex. App.—San Antonio,2020,TUTSA claimant must show it owns a trade secret in the information it seeks to protect,Kassab
294,30,"Morgan v. Clements Fluids S. Tex., Inc.","589 S.W.3d 177, 186-87",Tex. App.—Tyler,2018,TUTSA ownership requirement,Kassab
295,30,"Catania v. Garage de Le Paix, Inc.","542 S.W.2d 239, 242",Tex. Civ. App.—Tyler,1976,Plaintiff without title or right to possession cannot maintain suit in conversion,Kassab
296,30,Trammel Crow Co. No. 60 v. Harkinson,"944 S.W.2d 631, 635",Tex. Supreme Court,1997,Civil conspiracy requires showing defendant liable for underlying tort,Kassab
297,30,"Andrew Shebay & Co., P.P.L.C. v. Bishop","429 S.W.3d 644, 648-49",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2013,Texas public policy prohibits plaintiff from recovering damages from own illegal acts,Kassab
298,30,"Gulf, C. & S. F. RY. Co. v. Johnson","9 S.W. 602, 602-03",Tex. Supreme Court,1888,Origin of Unlawful Acts Rule: no action will lie if plaintiff requires aid from illegal transaction,Kassab
299,30,McNally v. McNally,"No. 02-18-00142-CV, 2020 WL 5241189",Tex. App.—Fort Worth,2020,Unlawful Acts Rule remains good law; uses 'inextricably intertwined' language,Kassab
300,30,"Dover v. Baker, Brown, Sharman & Parker","859 S.W.2d 441, 450-51",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],1993,Purpose of rule is to deter unlawful acts; rule applies even if defendants also committed unlawful acts,Kassab
301,30,Truyen Luong v. McAllister,"No. 01-17-00198-CV, 2018 WL 3651103",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2018,Barratry contract void for illegality; solicitation as essential purpose renders contract void,Kassab
302,30,Sharpe v. Turley,"191 S.W.3d 362, 363-64, 369",Tex. App.—Dallas,2006,Unlawful acts rule applied where plaintiff's claim to documents founded on illegal removal from property,Kassab
303,30,Denson v. Dallas Cnty. Credit Union,"262 S.W.3d 846, 855",Tex. App.—Dallas,2008,Cannot indirectly profit from business prohibited without proper license; tort claims inextricably intertwined with illegal contract,Kassab
304,30,Sw. Energy Prod. Co. v. Berry-Helfand,"491 S.W.3d 699, 710-11",Tex. Supreme Court,2016,"TUTSA damages: lost profits, defendant's actual profits, value investor would pay, development costs avoided, reasonable royalty",Kassab
305,30,"Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. v. Chapa","212 S.W.3d 299, 310-11",Tex. Supreme Court,2006,Texas law does not allow recovery of attorney's fees unless authorized by statute or contract — the American Rule,Kassab
306,30,"Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. v. Nat'l Dev. & Research Corp.","299 S.W.3d 106, 119",Tex. Supreme Court,2009,Texas Supreme Court declined to address whether 'tort of another' exception should be adopted,Kassab
307,30,Martin-Simon v. Womack,"68 S.W.3d 793, 797-98",Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2001,Attorney's fees in prior litigation generally not recoverable as damages,Kassab
308,30,Sunchase IV Homeowners Ass'n v. Atkinson,"643 S.W.3d 420, 422",Tex. Supreme Court,2022,Whether party entitled to attorney's fees is question of law,Kassab
309,30,Tex. Dep't of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda,"133 S.W.3d 217, 228",Tex. Supreme Court,2004,Purpose of summary judgments is to eliminate patently unmeritorious claims,Kassab
310,30,"Lujan v. Navistar, Inc.","555 S.W.3d 79, 84",Tex. Supreme Court,2018,Traditional MSJ standard — no genuine issue of material fact,Kassab
311,30,Ford Motor Co. v. Ridgway,"135 S.W.3d 598, 600",Tex. Supreme Court,2004,Genuine issue exists if more than scintilla of evidence produced,Kassab