citation_id,filing_id,case_name,citation,court,year,proposition,cited_by
844,66,In the Interest of E.S.,"No. 02-20-00407-CV, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 4153, at *24",Tex. App.—Fort Worth,2021,"Where witness willfully testifies falsely regarding material fact, new trial may be granted",Kassab
845,66,In re Marriage of Hutcherson,"2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 8719, at *10",Tex. App.,2019,Judgment vacated when award based on false testimony and fact finder was deceived on material issue,Kassab
846,66,Dixie Gas & Fuel Co. v. Jacobs,"47 S.W.2d 457, 462",Tex. Civ. App.—Beaumont,1932,"Where affidavits showed judgment based on perjury, trial court erred in denying new trial",Kassab
847,66,"Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc.","733 F.2d 509, 521-522",8th Cir.,1984,Abuse of discretion to fail to grant new trial based on newly discovered evidence of witness payment for false testimony,Kassab
848,66,In re George,"28 S.W.3d 511, 516",Tex.,2000,Attorney is agent of client; work product belongs to client,Kassab
849,66,In re McCann,"422 S.W.3d 701, 706",Tex. Crim. App.,2013,Lien is transitory interest in someone else's property; attorney asserting lien never owns property,Kassab
850,66,Fmc Techs. v. Murphy,"No. 01-21-00455-CV, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 5984, at *62",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2023,Must prove competitive advantage for independent economic value,Kassab
851,66,Tex. Comm'n on Human Rights v. Morrison,"381 S.W.3d 533, 537",Tex.,2012,Broad-form question cannot put before jury issues with no basis in law or evidence; appealing party need not prove jury relied on invalid theory,Kassab
852,66,"Title Source, Inc. v. HouseCanary, Inc.","612 S.W.3d 517, 531",Tex. App.—San Antonio,2020,Theories not supported by evidence should be omitted from improper means definition submitted to jury,Kassab
853,66,Crown Life Ins. Co. v. Casteel,"22 S.W.3d 378, 389",Tex.,2000,Inclusion of invalid theories in broad-form charge constitutes harmful error,Kassab
854,66,Gen. Universal Sys. v. HAL Inc.,"500 F.3d 444, 451",5th Cir.,2007,TUTSA explicitly precludes treating trade secret misappropriation as continuing tort,Kassab
855,66,Sw. Energy Prod. Co. v. Berry-Helfand,"491 S.W.3d 699, 710-11, 721-22",Tex.,2016,Cause of action accrues when trade secret actually used; recoverable losses defined; damages cannot be based on sheer speculation,Kassab
856,66,"Agar Corp., Inc. v. Electro Circuits Int'l, LLC","580 S.W.3d 136, 145-46",Tex.,2019,Rejected last-overt-act rule; conspiracy claim accrues when underlying tort accrues; claims against co-conspirators accrue on same date as first overt act,Kassab
857,66,Harang v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.,"400 S.W.2d 810, 813",Tex. Civ. App.—Houston,1966,Limitations runs from when injury occurs; conspiracy claim against late-added co-conspirator time-barred,Kassab
858,66,Elbaor v. Smith,"845 S.W.2d 240, 243",Tex.,1992,"Substantive, non-discretionary directive requiring courts to submit requested questions if pleadings and evidence support them",Kassab
859,66,"Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Johnson","9 S.W. 602, 602-03",Tex.,1888,No action lies to recover damages if plaintiff requires aid from illegal transaction,Kassab
860,66,Sharpe v. Turley,"191 S.W.3d 362, 366",Tex. App.—Dallas,2006,"If illegal act inextricably intertwined with claim and damages would not have occurred but for illegal act, plaintiff cannot recover",Kassab
861,66,McNally v. McNally,"No. 02-18-00142-CV, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 7211, at *27",Tex. App.—Fort Worth,2020,Unlawful acts doctrine applies without criminal conviction if conduct was in fact illegal,Kassab
862,66,Bartnicki v. Vopper,"532 U.S. 514, 539",U.S.,2001,"Trade secret law permits disclosures relevant to public health/safety, crime, or substantial public concern",Kassab
863,66,Alderson v. United States,"718 F. Supp. 2d 1186, 1200",C.D. Cal.,2010,There cannot be any trade secret about ongoing illegality,Kassab
864,66,"Sys. Operations, Inc. v. Sci. Games Dev. Corp.","425 F. Supp. 130, 136",D.N.J.,1977,Disclosure of trade secret information may itself be privileged,Kassab
865,66,"Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Medina","814 S.W.2d 71, 73",Tex. App.—Corpus Christi,1991,Public policy strongly favors exposure of crime,Kassab
866,66,Cluck v. Mecom,"401 S.W.3d 110, 114",Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2011,Fiduciary has affirmative duty to make full and accurate confession of fiduciary activities,Kassab
867,66,R.R. Comm'n of Tex. v. Gulf Energy Expl. Corp.,"482 S.W.3d 559, 566-71",Tex.,2016,Charge error on contested critical issue is generally harmful and reversible; trial court erred by failing to submit pled and evidence-supported affirmative defense,Kassab
868,66,Fort Worth Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Palazzolo,"498 S.W.3d 674, 686",Tex. App.—Fort Worth,2016,Trial court erred by refusing to submit properly supported affirmative defense,Kassab
869,66,The State Bar v. Kilpatrick,"874 S.W.2d 656, 657",Tex.,1994,Expert testimony on barratry issue permitted; disbarment rendered even absent criminal conviction,Kassab
870,66,State v. Mercier,"164 S.W.3d 799, 816",Tex. App.—Corpus Christi,2005,Expert testimony about disciplinary rules and how conduct violated barratry rules properly admitted,Kassab
871,66,Reynolds v. State,"No. 08-15-00373-CR, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 11059, at *15-16, 32-33",Tex. App.—El Paso,2017,Criminal barratry conviction upheld based on expert testimony on barratry statute and proper client solicitation,Kassab
872,66,In re Christus Spohn Hosp. Kleberg,"222 S.W.3d 434, 440",Tex.,2007,Expert may state opinion on mixed questions of law and fact,Kassab
873,66,Mega Child Care v. Tex. Dep't of Protective & Regulatory Servs.,"29 S.W.3d 303, 309",Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2000,Whether conduct meets fixed legal standard is mixed question of law and fact,Kassab
874,66,H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. Bilotto,"985 S.W.2d 22, 24",Tex.,1998,"To be direct comment on weight of evidence, issue submitted must suggest trial court's opinion on the matter",Kassab
875,66,Youngkin v. Hines,"546 S.W.3d 675, 682",Tex.,2018,Filing lawsuits and pleadings fell within attorney immunity,Kassab
876,66,Kassab v. Pohl,"612 S.W.3d 571, 578",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2020,Kassab's conduct arose out of commercial transaction involving type of legal services he provides,Kassab
877,66,"K3 Enter., Inc. v. Sasowski","No. 20-24441-CIV-CAN, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234206, at *10",S.D. Fla.,2022,"Actual loss means lost profits, lost customers, lost market share",Kassab
878,66,"Fin. Info. Techs., LLC v. iControl Sys., USA, LLC","21 F.4th 1267, 1276",11th Cir.,2021,Actual loss understood as lost profits,Kassab
879,66,"Selectica, Inc. v. Novatus, Inc.","No. 6:13-cv-1708-Orl-40TBS, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191940, at *9",M.D. Fla.,2015,"Actual loss defined as lost profits, lost customers, lost market share",Kassab
880,66,"Saforo & Assocs., Inc. v. Porocel Corp.","991 S.W.2d 117, 124",Ark.,1999,Actual loss means plaintiff's lost profits or defendant's gain,Kassab
881,66,"GME, Inc. v. Carter","917 P.2d 754, 757",Idaho,1996,Anomaly to allow attorney fees as damages under trade secrets act,Kassab
882,66,"Twin Falls Staffing, LLC v. Visser (In re Visser)","No. 1:13-cv-00408-BLW, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56705, at *9",D. Idaho,2014,Trade secret losses logically include lost profits but not attorney fees,Kassab
883,66,"Morgan v. Clements Fluids S. Tex., Ltd.","589 S.W.3d 177, 191 n.4",Tex. App.—Tyler,2018,Courts should look to other states' UTSA interpretations,Kassab
884,66,"Lacore Enters., LLC v. Angles","No. 05-21-00798-CV, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 1926, at *32-33",Tex. App.—Dallas,2023,Attorney's fees incurred in a lawsuit are not actual damages,Kassab
885,66,Martin-Simon v. Womack,"68 S.W.3d 793, 797",Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2001,Fees from prior litigation generally not recoverable absent agreement,Kassab
886,66,Tana Oil & Gas Corp. v. McCall,"104 S.W.3d 80, 81-82",Tex.,2003,Attorney fees for defending different claim not recoverable as damages,Kassab
887,66,O'Neal v. Dale,"No. 02-20-00173-CV, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 466, at *28",Tex. App.—Fort Worth,2021,Claim of incurring attorney fees to defend against another claim is not viable damage claim,Kassab
888,66,"Tex. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ray Ferguson Interests, Inc.","No. 01-02-00807-CV, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 2001, at *23-24",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2006,Financial loss due to time spent on litigation in another case not recoverable,Kassab
889,66,"Woodhaven Partners Ltd. v. Shamoun & Norman, L.L.P.","422 S.W.3d 821, 837",Tex. App.—Dallas,2014,Party relying on non-recoverable damages alone has presented legal barrier to recovery,Kassab
890,66,Naschke v. Gulf Coast Conference,"187 S.W.3d 653, 655",Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2006,Tort of another exception; court bound to follow existing law,Kassab
891,66,"Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. v. Nat'l Dev. & Research Corp.","299 S.W.3d 106, 119",Tex.,2009,Did not address whether tort of another exception should be adopted,Kassab
892,66,Riner v. Neumann,"353 S.W.3d 312, 323",Tex. App.—Dallas,2011,Declined to adopt tort of another exception,Kassab
893,66,TOKA Gen. Contractors v. Wm. Rigg Co.,"No. 04-12-00474-CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 3776, at *20",Tex. App.—San Antonio,2014,Collecting cases declining tort of another,Kassab
894,66,"Per-Se Techs., Inc. v. Sybase, Inc.","No. 01-03-01293-CV, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5096, at *24",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2005,Tort of another as equitable doctrine requires wholly innocent plaintiff,Kassab
895,66,"Enbridge Pipelines (E. Tex.) L.P. v. Avinger Timber, LLC","386 S.W.3d 256, 262",Tex.,2012,Trial court must act as evidentiary gatekeeper screening out irrelevant testimony,Kassab
896,66,City of Harlingen v. Estate of Sharboneau,"48 S.W.3d 177, 182",Tex.,2001,Market value = price property brings from willing seller to willing buyer,Kassab
897,66,"Pike v. Tex. EMC Mgmt., LLC","610 S.W.3d 763, 782, 784 & n.27",Tex.,2020,Purchase price alone cannot establish market value; plaintiff cannot leave jury to speculate on amount saved,Kassab
898,66,"InterFirst Bank Dall., N.A. v. Risser","739 S.W.2d 882, 891",Tex. App.—Texarkana,1987,One sale not sufficient to fix fair market value,Kassab
899,66,"Mo., K. & T. R. Co. v. Moss","135 S.W. 626, 627",Tex. Civ. App.,1911,Single sale admissible but not sufficient to establish market value,Kassab
900,66,Szczepanik v. First S. Tr. Co.,"883 S.W.2d 648, 649",Tex.,1994,Damages must be shown by competent evidence with reasonable certainty,Kassab
901,66,"Accurate Precision Plating, LLC v. Guerrero","No. 01-14-00706-CV, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 12034, at *7, 9",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2015,Property owner may testify on value; but must be market value not intrinsic/speculative; owner of business could not testify to lost profits,Kassab
902,66,"Jatex Oil & Gas Expl. L.P. v. Nadel & Gussman Permian, L.L.C.","629 S.W.3d 397, 407",Tex. App.—Eastland,2020,Property owner rule does not extend to technical or specialized matters,Kassab
903,66,"Arkoma Basin Expl. Co. v. FMF Assocs. 1990-A, Ltd.","249 S.W.3d 380, 388",Tex.,2008,Technical/specialized valuation not a matter of common knowledge,Kassab
904,66,Horizon Health Corp. v. Acadia Healthcare Co.,"520 S.W.3d 848, 867",Tex.,2017,"Must analyze malice evidence for each defendant separately, not grouped together",Kassab
905,66,"Safeshred, Inc. v. Martinez","365 S.W.3d 655, 665",Tex.,2012,Conduct necessary for liability cannot serve as basis for punitive damages; legally justified conduct not probative of malice,Kassab
906,66,"Eagle Oil & Gas Co. v. Shale Expl., LLC","549 S.W.3d 256, 285",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2018,"No evidence of injury independent of misappropriation itself is insufficient for malice; if sufficient, exemplary damages would be routine rather than exceptional",Kassab
907,66,Reynolds v. Sanchez Oil & Gas Corp.,"No. 01-18-00940-CV, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 8903, at *47-48",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2023,TUTSA preempts claims primarily based on misappropriation of trade secrets,Kassab
908,66,"VEST Safety Med. Servs., LLC v. Arbor Env't, LLC","No. 4:20-CV-0812, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127285, at *10",S.D. Tex.,2022,Weight of authority demonstrates conspiracy claim preempted by TUTSA,Kassab
909,66,In re YRC Inc.,"646 S.W.3d 805, 809",Tex.,2022,Court required to grant leave to designate responsible third parties if timely motion pleads sufficient facts,Kassab
910,66,Sanchez v. Castillo,"No. 05-18-01033-CV, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 1867, at *15",Tex. App.—Dallas,2020,"Erroneous denial of responsible third party designation skews proceedings, affects outcome, compromises defense",Kassab
911,66,Cheatham v. Pohl,"No. 01-20-00046-CV, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 6528",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2022,Related pending barratry litigation against Pohl,Kassab
912,66,Ginsberg v. Fifth Court of Appeals,"686 S.W.2d 105, 106, 108",Tex.,1985,Offensive use doctrine — plaintiff cannot assert privilege to protect information materially relevant to defendant's defenses,Kassab
913,66,In re Nat'l Lloyds Ins. Co.,"532 S.W.3d 794, 807",Tex.,2017,Party may waive work-product privilege through offensive use by relying on billing records to recover attorney fees,Kassab
914,66,"In re Beirne, Maynard & Parsons, L.L.P.","260 S.W.3d 229, 231",Tex. App.—Texarkana,2008,Attorney cannot deny opposing party right to review documents supporting reimbursement claim,Kassab
915,66,Remington Arms Co. v. Caldwell,"850 S.W.2d 167, 170",Tex.,1993,Trial court has power during trial to sanction nondisclosure by excluding evidence,Kassab
916,66,Marino v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.,"787 S.W.2d 948, 949-50",Tex.,1990,Res judicata does not apply if facts change and relationship between parties altered,Kassab
917,66,"Rohrmoos Venture v. UTSW DVA Healthcare, LLP","578 S.W.3d 469, 494, 501",Tex.,2019,"General conclusory testimony devoid of real substance will not support fee award; without evidence of Disciplinary Rule 1.04 factors, fact finder has no meaningful way to determine reasonableness",Kassab
918,66,Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equip. Corp.,"945 S.W.2d 812, 818",Tex.,1997,"Eight factors for reasonable attorney fees: time/labor, preclusion of other employment, customary fees, amount involved/results, time limitations, professional relationship, experience/reputation/ability, fixed/contingent fee",Kassab
919,66,"THB Constr., LLC v. Holt Tex., Ltd.","No. 05-20-00020-CV, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 277, at *7-12",Tex. App.—Dallas,2022,Heavily redacted invoices fail to identify work performed; insufficient to support fee award,Kassab
920,66,Stewart Title Guar. Co. v. Sterling,"822 S.W.2d 1, 10",Tex.,1991,Fees must be shown incurred while suing party on claim that allows fee recovery,Kassab
921,66,"Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. v. Chapa","212 S.W.3d 299, 313",Tex.,2006,Must segregate recoverable from unrecoverable fees,Kassab
922,66,Desio v. Bosque,"No. 05-21-00022-CV, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 1202, at *12",Tex. App.—Dallas,2022,General conclusory testimony insufficient to explain how services advanced both recoverable and unrecoverable claims,Kassab
923,66,Yowell v. Granite Operating Co.,"620 S.W.3d 335, 354-55",Tex.,2020,Conditional appellate fees require opinion testimony about services reasonably necessary to defend appeal and reasonable hourly rate,Kassab
924,66,"KBIDC Invs., LLC v. Zuru Toys Inc.","No. 05-19-00159-CV, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 8055, at *63-65",Tex. App.—Dallas,2020,Conclusory testimony of lump-sum appellate fee amounts insufficient to support conditional appellate fee award,Kassab
925,66,Jimmie Luecke Children P'ship v. Droemer,"No. 03-20-00096-CV, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 605, at *21",Tex. App.—Austin,2022,Conclusory appellate fee testimony insufficient,Kassab