citation_id,filing_id,case_name,citation,court,year,proposition,cited_by
69,15,In re Roser,2016 WL 2605686,Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2016,Mandatory stay under § 51.014(b) applies to all trial court proceedings including discovery,Pohl
70,15,In re Texas Educ. Agency,441 S.W.3d 747,Tex. App.—Austin,2014,Conducting hearings during mandatory stay was abuse of discretion violating § 51.014(b),Pohl
71,15,"In re Bliss & Glennon, Inc.",2014 WL 50831,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2014,Mandamus relief granted when trial court took action during mandatory stay under § 51.014(b),Pohl
72,15,Roccaforte v. Jefferson County,341 S.W.3d 919,Texas Supreme Court,2011,"Trial court actions taken in violation of § 51.014(b) stay are voidable, not void",Pohl
73,15,Bacharach v. Garcia,485 S.W.3d 600,Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2016,TCPA 60-day filing period begins from service of original petition and is not reset by amended petitions,Pohl
74,15,Wheeler v. Green,157 S.W.3d 439,Texas Supreme Court,2005,Lawyer's failure to meet a deadline is an elementary mistake that could warrant conclusion of intent or conscious indifference,Pohl
75,15,"LFMC Enterprises, LLC v. Baker",546 S.W.3d 893,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2018,Defendants bear burden of demonstrating TCPA applicability by preponderance of evidence,Pohl
76,15,In re Lipsky,460 S.W.3d 579,Texas Supreme Court,2015,"TCPA is intended to dismiss lawsuits designed to chill First Amendment rights, not dismiss meritorious lawsuits; defines prima facie case standard; 'clear' means unambiguous, sure, free from doubt; 'specific' means explicit or relating to a particular named thing",Pohl
77,15,"Wayne Dolcefino & Dolcefino Communications, LLC v. Cypress Creek EMS",540 S.W.3d 194,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2017,Two-step TCPA procedure; movant must establish connection between claims and protected conduct; evidence viewed in light most favorable to nonmovant,Pohl
78,15,ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. v. Coleman,512 S.W.3d 895,Texas Supreme Court,2017,Two-step TCPA procedure for expediting dismissal of claims chilling First Amendment rights,Pohl
79,15,Hersh v. Tatum,526 S.W.3d 462,Texas Supreme Court,2017,"Basis of legal action determined by plaintiff's allegations, not defendant's characterizations; petition is the best and all-sufficient evidence of the nature of the action",Pohl
80,15,Sloat v. Rathbun,513 S.W.3d 500,Tex. App.—Austin,2015,Courts should not blindly accept defendant's recharacterization of claims; should favor conclusion claims are not predicated on protected expression; activities not factual predicate for claims are not pertinent,Pohl
81,15,Castleman v. Internet Money Ltd.,546 S.W.3d 684,Texas Supreme Court,2018,Four-part test for TCPA commercial speech exception under § 27.010(b); discusses how the 'capacity' of the person is relevant to whether they were primarily engaged in selling goods or services,Pohl
82,15,In re E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.,136 S.W.3d 218,Texas Supreme Court,2004,Prima facie case is minimum quantum of evidence to support rational inference that allegation of fact is true,Pohl
83,15,"S & S Emergency Training Sols., Inc. v. Elliott",2018 WL 6711322,Texas Supreme Court,2018,Defining 'clear and specific' evidence requirement under TCPA,Pohl
84,15,"Hicks v. Group & Pension Administrators, Inc.",473 S.W.3d 518,Tex. App.—Corpus Christi,2015,Detailed pleading allegations sufficient to establish prima facie case under TCPA,Pohl
85,15,"Prime Products, Inc. v. S.S.I. Plastics, Inc.",97 S.W.3d 631,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2002,Elements of a breach of contract claim,Pohl
86,15,Stockyards Nat. Bank v. Maples,95 S.W.2d 1300,Tex. Comm'n App.,1936,Petition is the best and all-sufficient evidence of the nature of the action,Pohl
87,15,Sullivan v. Abraham,488 S.W.3d 294,Texas Supreme Court,2016,"Movant bears burden of proof on attorney's fees including documentation of services, hourly rates, and time required",Pohl
88,15,Stine v. Stewart,80 S.W.3d 586,Texas Supreme Court,2002,Four-year statute of limitations for breach of contract,Pohl
89,15,Mayes v. Stewart,316 S.W.3d 715,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2006,Limitations periods for civil conspiracy claims follow the underlying torts,Pohl