citation_id,filing_id,case_name,citation,court,year,proposition,cited_by
376,36,"Regency Field Services, LLC v. Swift Energy Operating, LLC","622 S.W.3d 807, 817-18",Tex.,2021,Defendant seeking summary judgment on limitations must conclusively establish limitations period expired before suit filed; claim accrues when wrongful conduct causes legal injury,Pohl
377,36,Burns v. Rochon,"190 S.W.3d 263, 271",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2006,Conversion claim accrues at time of defendant's 'unlawful taking',Pohl
378,36,Pemex Exploracion y Produccion v. BASF Corp.,"2013 WL 5514944, at *31",S.D. Tex.,2013,Each possession of converted property is a new conversion (applying Texas law),Pohl
379,36,Sw. Energy Prod. Co. v. Berry-Helfand,"491 S.W.3d 699, 710-11, 721-22",Tex.,2016,"TUTSA cause of action accrues when trade secret is actually used commercially; damages include lost profits, defendant's profits, reasonable investor value, development costs, reasonable royalty",Pohl
380,36,"Agar Corp., Inc. v. Electro Circuits Int'l, LLC","580 S.W.3d 136, 145",Tex.,2019,Civil conspiracy claim accrues as to each underlying tort when that tort occurs,Pohl
381,36,Taylor v. Baylor Scott & White Med. Ctr.-Frisco,"No. 05-20-00352-CV, 2022 WL 405896, at *3",Tex. App.—Dallas,2022,Deposition testimony from different proceeding is inadmissible hearsay unless within exclusion,Pohl
382,36,Dugger v. Arredondo,"408 S.W.3d 825, 831-32",Tex.,2013,Common law unlawful acts doctrine is 'no longer a viable defense' under proportionate responsibility framework; 'plain language of section 33.003' eliminates it,Pohl
383,36,Boerjan v. Rodriguez,2014 Tex. LEXIS 531,Tex.,2014,Comparative responsibility scheme under Chapter 33 abrogated the unlawful acts doctrine,Pohl
385,36,Denson v. Dallas Cnty. Credit Union,"262 S.W.3d 846, 855",Tex. App.—Dallas,2008,No action may be predicated upon an 'admittedly unlawful act' of the party asserting it,Pohl
386,36,Sharpe v. Turley,"191 S.W.3d 362, 366",Tex. App.—Dallas,2006,"If illegal act is inextricably intertwined with claim and damages would not have occurred but for illegal act, plaintiff not entitled to recover as matter of law",Pohl
387,36,Arredondo v. Dugger,"347 S.W.3d 757, 761-62",Tex. App.—Dallas,2011,Unlawful acts doctrine requires proximate cause between illegal act and injury,Pohl
388,36,Carcamo-Lopez v. Does 1 through 20,"865 F. Supp. 2d 736, 767",W.D. Tex.,2011,"When illegal conduct arises in a defense and not in the plaintiff's case, the unlawful acts rule will not bar claims",Pohl
389,36,Marathon Oil Co. v. Hadley,"107 S.W.2d 883, 885",Tex. Civ. App.,1935,"Plaintiff may recover if complete cause of action can be shown without proving own illegal act, even though illegal act may incidentally appear",Pohl
390,36,Macias v. Moreno,"30 S.W.3d 25, 29",Tex. App.—El Paso,2000,Requires 'admittedly unlawful act'; plaintiff may recover if cause of action not essentially founded on illegality,Pohl
391,36,Pyeatt v. Anderson,"269 S.W. 429, 430",Tex. Comm'n App.,1925,Illegal act must be proximate cause of plaintiff's injury,Pohl
392,36,Petta v. Rivera,"985 S.W.2d 199, 204",Tex. App.—Corpus Christi-Edinburg,1998,Proximate cause requirement for unlawful acts doctrine,Pohl
394,36,Taylor v. Tolbert,"644 S.W.3d 637, 646",Tex.,2022,Attorney immunity applies only to 'lawyerly work' in adversarial contexts; conduct foreign to duties of a lawyer or outside scope of client representation is not protected,Pohl
395,36,"Haynes & Boone, LLP v. NFTD, LLC","631 S.W.3d 65, 67",Tex.,2021,Attorney immunity inapplicable outside scope of client representation,Pohl
396,36,"Landry's, Inc. v. Animal Legal Defense Fund","631 S.W.3d 40, 46-47",Tex.,2021,Attorney immunity requires conduct in 'uniquely lawyerly capacity'; judicial proceedings privilege applies only to communications in due course of judicial proceeding for libel/slander,Pohl
397,36,"Cantey Hanger, LLP v. Byrd","467 S.W.3d 477, 481",Tex.,2015,Attorney immunity applies to kind of conduct in which attorney engages when discharging duties to client,Pohl
398,36,Youngkin v. Hines,"546 S.W.3d 675, 682-83",Tex.,2018,Two inquiries for attorney immunity: type of conduct at issue and existence of attorney-client relationship at the time,Pohl
399,36,"Tanox, Inc. v. Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P.","105 S.W.3d 244, 254-55",Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2003,"Attorney-client relationship requires 'meeting of the minds'; solicitation of clients necessarily precedes relationship formation, so no immunity for pre-relationship conduct",Pohl
400,36,In re Nolle,265 S.W.3d 487,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2008,Unclean hands is a defense to equitable relief applying when party engaged in wrongful conduct harming person raising defense,Pohl
403,36,"Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. v. National Development and Research Corp.","299 S.W.3d 106, 120",Tex.,2009,Texas Supreme Court declined to extend Martin-Simon; questioned availability of prior attorneys' fees as damages,Pohl
404,36,"Dixon Fin. Services, Ltd. v. Chang","325 S.W.3d 668, 678",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2010,Attorneys' fees from prior litigation may be recovered as actual damages in subsequent suit in certain circumstances,Pohl