citation_id,filing_id,case_name,citation,court,year,proposition,cited_by
750,62,USAA Tex. Lloyds Co. v. Menchaca,545 S.W.3d 479,Tex.,2018,Court must reasonably construe jury findings to harmonize them; Rule 295 provides procedure for resolving incomplete and conflicting verdicts; party who must rely on conflicting answer to avoid effect of answers establishing liability bore the burden to object; same rule applies whether complaint is incompleteness or fatal conflict,Pohl
751,62,Bruce v. Oscar Renda Contracting,657 S.W.3d 453,Tex. App.—El Paso,2022,Cited Menchaca and found defendant had burden to object to lack of unanimity certificate before jury discharged; unanimity certificate could not be used due to misnumbered questions but exemplary damages still awarded; signed certificate not necessary for award of exemplary damages,Pohl
752,62,Stover v. ADM Milling Co.,"No. 05-17-00778-CV, 2018 WL 6818561",Tex. App.—Dallas,2018,Exemplary damages upheld despite jury not signing unanimity certificate for threshold liability questions (5 and 6) because jury later unanimously answered predicate questions; not all predicate answers require a certificate of unanimity; jury presumed to follow instructions,Pohl
753,62,Bryan v. Papalia,542 S.W.3d 676,Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2017,Defendant's counsel requested jury be polled when unanimity ambiguity existed; trial court sent jury back to clarify; illustrates what Kassab should have done,Pohl
754,62,Redwine v. Peckinpaugh,535 S.W.3d 44,Tex. App.—Tyler,2017,Distinguished — court polled the jury and confirmed non-unanimity; predates Menchaca (2018); Kassab's 'most analogous' case is facially not on point because Kassab chose not to poll the jury,Pohl
755,62,Bender v. S. Pac. Transp. Co.,600 S.W.2d 257,Tex.,1980,Court must reasonably construe jury findings to harmonize them,Pohl
756,62,"Dixon Fin. Services, Ltd. v. Chang",325 S.W.3d 668,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2010,Published precedent allowing court to apply tort of another doctrine; equitable principles allow recovery of attorney's fees as actual damages when party required to prosecute or defend prior legal action as consequence of defendant's wrongful act; no clean hands requirement,Pohl
757,62,"Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. v. Nat'l Dev. & Research Corp.",299 S.W.3d 106,Tex.,2009,Texas Supreme Court's discussion of tort of another doctrine indicates no clean hands requirement,Pohl
758,62,Massey v. Columbus State Bank,35 S.W.3d 697,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2000,No requirement that party must have clean hands or be wholly innocent to recover fees as damages under tort of another,Pohl
759,62,Lesikar v. Rappeport,33 S.W.3d 282,Tex. App.—Texarkana,2000,Tort of another doctrine applied without clean hands requirement,Pohl
760,62,Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Stephenson,963 S.W.2d 81,Tex. App.—Beaumont,1997,Tort of another doctrine applied without clean hands requirement,Pohl
761,62,"Symetra Life Ins. Co. v. Rapid Settlements, Ltd.",775 F.3d 242,5th Cir.,2014,Tort of another doctrine applied without clean hands requirement,Pohl
762,62,Wood v. Wiggins,650 S.W.3d 533,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2021,"To establish unclean hands defense, party must show an injury to himself arising from the conduct; the clean hands maxim should not be applied when the defendants have not been seriously harmed",Pohl
763,62,"Whitlock v. CSI Risk Mgmt., LLC","No. 05-19-01297-CV, 2021 WL 1712215",Tex. App.—Dallas,2021,Texas law permits joint and several liability when there is a conspiracy to misappropriate trade secrets,Pohl