citation_id,filing_id,case_name,citation,court,year,proposition,cited_by
349,34,Phila. Indem. Ins. Co. v. White,"490 S.W.3d 468, 483",Tex.,2016,Cited by Pohl; distinguished by Kassab as unrelated landlord-tenant case not discussing interaction of illegality defense and unlawful acts doctrine,Pohl (distinguished by Kassab)
350,34,Lewkowicz v. El Paso Apparel Corp.,"625 S.W.2d 301, 303",Tex.,1981,Cited by Pohl; distinguished by Kassab — held that illegal actions concerning leather production and jailing in Mexico violate Texas public policy,Pohl (distinguished by Kassab)
351,34,Niles v. Harris County Fresh Water Supply Dist.,"339 S.W.2d 562, 563",Tex. Civ. App.—Waco,1960,Cited by Pohl; distinguished by Kassab — affirmed that pleading of illegality was unnecessary where contract was illegal on its face,Pohl (distinguished by Kassab)
352,34,Reid v. Associated Employers Lloyds,"164 S.W.2d 584, 585-586",Tex. Civ. App.—Fort Worth,1942,Cited by Pohl; distinguished by Kassab — concerned whether illegality must be affirmatively asserted as defense to worker's compensation claim from unlading a keg of beer,Pohl (distinguished by Kassab)
353,34,Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Lusk,52 S.W.2d 1110,Tex. Civ. App.—Waco,1932,Cited by Pohl; distinguished by Kassab — concerned whether contract requiring work for more than 9 hours a day violated a statute,Pohl (distinguished by Kassab)
354,34,Texas & P. Coal Co. v. Lawson,"89 Tex. 394, 34 S.W. 919, 921",Tex.,1896,Cited by Pohl; distinguished by Kassab — concerned legality of contract for sale of liquor,Pohl (distinguished by Kassab)