citation_id,filing_id,case_name,citation,court,year,proposition,cited_by
728,60,"Lacore Enters., LLC v. Angles","No. 05-21-00798-CV, 2023 WL 2607562",Tex. App.—Dallas,2023,Distinguished by Pohl — stands for non-controversial conclusion that fees from the same lawsuit are not recoverable as damages under the American rule,Pohl (distinguishing)
729,60,O'Neal v. Dale,"No. 02-20-00173-CV, 2021 WL 210848",Tex. App.—Fort Worth,2021,Distinguished by Pohl — stands for uncontroversial proposition that fees incurred in the present lawsuit do not typically constitute damages,Pohl (distinguishing)
730,60,"Woodhaven Partners, Ltd. v. Shamoun & Norman, L.L.P.",422 S.W.3d 821,Tex. App.—Dallas,2014,Distinguished by Pohl — concerned damages consisting of fees in defending against same lawsuit and prosecuting counterclaims,Pohl (distinguishing)
731,60,Tana Oil & Gas Corp. v. McCall,104 S.W.3d 80,Tex.,2003,Distinguished by Pohl — rejected argument about value of parties' own time; did not concern attorney fees recovery,Pohl (distinguishing)
732,60,"Tex. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ray Ferguson Interests, Inc.","No. 01-02-00807-CV, 2006 WL 648834",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2006,"Distinguished by Pohl — concerned financial loss from employee time on depositions in same lawsuit, not attorney fees from separate proceedings",Pohl (distinguishing)
733,60,Martin-Simon v. Womack,68 S.W.3d 793,Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2001,Cited by Kassab for proposition fees only recoverable by agreement; Pohl argues this was effectively overruled by Akin Gump (2009),Pohl (distinguishing)
734,60,Riner v. Neumann,353 S.W.3d 312,Tex. App.—Dallas,2011,Pohl argues Kassab's citation is false — Riner does not mention tort of another doctrine; it addressed American Rule on same-case fees,Pohl (distinguishing)