citation_id,filing_id,case_name,citation,court,year,proposition,cited_by
320,33,Cheatham v. Pohl,"No. 01-20-00046-CV, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 6528",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2022,The Cheatham barratry case was reversed on appeal — court of appeals concluded dismissal on summary judgment was erroneous; case remanded and ongoing,Kassab
321,33,Brumfield v. Williamson,634 S.W.3d 170,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2021,"Brumfield barratry case dismissed on limitations, affirmed on appeal May 27, 2021, Texas Supreme Court denied review January 28, 2022",Kassab
322,33,Gandy v. Williamson,634 S.W.3d 214,Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2021,"Gandy barratry case dismissed on limitations, affirmed on appeal",Kassab
323,33,Walker et al. v. Williamson et al. (Mississippi Litigation),Cause No. 1:14-cv-381-KS-JCG,"U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi, Southern Division",2014,The underlying Mississippi litigation by Precision Marketing owners against Pohl for breach of client-referral agreement — the case that revealed Pohl's alleged solicitation scheme,Kassab