citation_id,filing_id,case_name,citation,court,year,proposition,cited_by
926,67,"In re Columbia Med. Ctr. of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P.","290 S.W.3d 204, 210-13",Tex.,2009,"Jury's decision not to be tampered with lightly; trial court's discretion has limits; must be for specific, significant, proper reasons",Pohl
927,67,Herbert v. Herbert,"754 S.W.2d 141, 144",Tex.,1988,Long-established precedents demonstrate respect for jury verdicts,Pohl
928,67,In re C.H.,"89 S.W.3d 17, 25",Tex.,2002,"Factual sufficiency only prevails where finding so against great weight as to be manifestly unjust, shock conscience, or clearly demonstrate bias",Pohl
929,67,Pool v. Ford Motor Co.,"715 S.W.2d 629, 635",Tex.,1986,Factual sufficiency standard,Pohl
930,67,Jang Won Cho v. Kun Sik Kim,"572 S.W.3d 783, 810",Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2019,Factual sufficiency under clear and convincing standard requires determining whether fact finder could reasonably form firm conviction or belief,Pohl
931,67,"Four J's Cmty. Living Ctr., Inc. v. Wagner","630 S.W.3d 502, 513",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2021,Legal sufficiency requires demonstrating no evidence supports the finding,Pohl
932,67,In re Munsch,"614 S.W.3d 397, 400",Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2020,"New trial order must provide understandable, reasonably specific explanation; cannot simply parrot pro forma template",Pohl
933,67,"In re Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.","407 S.W.3d 746, 748-49",Tex.,2013,Trial court must explain with reasonable specificity why it granted new trial,Pohl
934,67,"In re United Scaffolding, Inc.","377 S.W.3d 685, 688-89",Tex.,2012,Trial court abuses discretion if new trial order provides no more than pro forma template,Pohl
935,67,In re Bent,"487 S.W.3d 170, 173",Tex.,2016,Constitutional requirements for new trial orders,Pohl
936,67,Zarate v. Rodriguez,"542 S.W.3d 26, 35",Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2017,Directed verdict warranted only when evidence is such that no other verdict can be rendered,Pohl
937,67,"Barrow-Shaver Res. Co. v. Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc.","590 S.W.3d 471, 480",Tex.,2019,Judgment against jury verdict proper only when law does not allow reasonable jurors to decide otherwise,Pohl
938,67,"Mitchell v. Bank of Am., N.A.","156 S.W.3d 622, 628",Tex. App.—Dallas,2004,Objections to court's charge in motion for new trial are untimely and preserve nothing for review,Pohl
939,67,Zermeno v. Garcia,"No. 14-17-00843-CV, 2019 WL 2063090, at *3 n.5",Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2019,Cannot raise charge objection for first time in motion for new trial,Pohl
940,67,Bryan v. Papalia,"542 S.W.3d 676, 692-93",Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2017,Party waives right to object to alleged verdict inconsistency by not asserting before court dismisses jury,Pohl
941,67,"Agar Corp., Inc. v. Electro Circuits Int'l, LLC","565 S.W.3d 12, 19-21 (COA); 580 S.W.3d 136 (Tex.)",Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] / Tex.,2016,"For a specific party, limitations starts when that party first misappropriated — not when third party did; different people can commit separate acts of misappropriation",Pohl
942,67,Dugger v. Arredondo,"408 S.W.3d 825, 831-32",Tex.,2013,Common law unlawful acts doctrine is no longer a viable defense — preempted by proportionate responsibility statute,Pohl
943,67,Carcamo-Lopez v. Does 1 through 20,"865 F. Supp. 2d 736, 767",W.D. Tex.,2011,"When illegal conduct arises in defense, not plaintiff's case, unlawful acts rule will not bar claims",Pohl
944,67,Alderson v. United States,"718 F. Supp. 2d 1186, 1200",C.D. Cal.,2010,Distinguished — dealt with protectable interest in knowledge of how fraud occurred; not analogous to customer lists,Pohl
945,67,Youngkin v. Hines,"546 S.W.3d 675, 683",Tex.,2018,Attorney immunity requires demonstration of 'existence of attorney-client relationship at the time',Pohl
946,67,"Landry's, Inc. v. Animal Legal Def. Fund","631 S.W.3d 40, 46",Tex.,2021,Judicial proceedings privilege applies only to communications in due course of judicial proceeding and protects against libel/slander,Pohl
947,67,"Dew v. Crown Derrick Erectors, Inc.","208 S.W.3d 448, 452",Tex.,2006,Threshold inquiry for superseding cause is whether intervening cause and consequences could reasonably have been anticipated by original wrongdoer,Pohl
948,67,Sw. Energy Prod. Co. v. Berry-Helfand,"491 S.W.3d 699, 710",Tex.,2016,Flexible and imaginative approach applied to calculation of damages in trade secret cases,Pohl
949,67,"Dixon Fin. Servs., Ltd. v. Chang","325 S.W.3d 668, 678",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2010,Equitable principles allow recovery of attorney fees as actual damages when party required to prosecute/defend prior action as consequence of defendant's wrongful act,Pohl
950,67,"LaCore Enters., LLC v. Angles","No. 05-21-00798-CV, 2023 WL 2607562, at *9",Tex. App.—Dallas,2023,"Distinguished — dealt with fees from same proceeding, not fees from other cases; Pohl argues Kassab mischaracterizes this case",Pohl
951,67,"Red Sea Gaming, Inc. v. Block Investments (Nevada) Co.","338 S.W.3d 562, 572-73",Tex. App.—El Paso,2010,"Appropriate for property owner to consider unaccepted offers, market knowledge, and actual sale price when testifying to value",Pohl
952,67,"Custom Transit, L.P. v. Flatrolled Steel, Inc.","375 S.W.3d 337, 352",Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2012,Property owner rule applies even to intangible property,Pohl
953,67,Jabri v. Alsayyed,"145 S.W.3d 660, 667",Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2004,Property owner allowed to testify regarding market value of business goodwill (intangible property),Pohl
954,67,"Horizon Health Corp. v. Acadia Healthcare Co., Inc.","520 S.W.3d 848, 867",Tex.,2017,"Clear and convincing evidence of outrageous, malicious, or reprehensible conduct supports exemplary damages",Pohl
955,67,"Safeshred, Inc. v. Martinez","365 S.W.3d 655, 662",Tex.,2012,Malice may exist where employer circulates false/malicious rumors or actively interferes with employee's ability to find other employment,Pohl
956,67,In re Dawson,"550 S.W.3d 625, 630",Tex.,2018,Failure to comply with timely disclosure obligations is independent basis to deny responsible third party designation,Pohl
957,67,Republic Ins. Co. v. Davis,856 S.W.2d 158,Tex.,1993,"Three-part test for offensive use waiver: (1) affirmative relief implicating privileged materials, (2) outcome determinative, (3) only way to obtain evidence",Pohl
958,67,"In re Microvast, Inc.","No. 01-18-00049-CV, 2018 WL 4131068, at *5",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2018,Three-part offensive use waiver test,Pohl
959,67,"KBIDC Investments, LLC v. Zuru Toys Inc.","No. 05-19-00159-CV, 2020 WL 5988014, at *22",Tex. App.—Dallas,2020,Attorney invoices are routinely redacted when offered into evidence to protect privilege,Pohl
960,67,Desio v. Del Bosque,"No. 05-21-00022-CV, 2022 WL 500025",Tex. App.—Dallas,2022,Distinguished — dealt with fee affidavit without billing records; Pohl provided billing records at trial,Pohl
961,67,Yowell v. Granite Operating Co.,"620 S.W.3d 335, 355",Tex.,2020,Conditional appellate fees require opinion testimony about services reasonably necessary and reasonable hourly rate,Pohl
962,67,Marino v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.,"787 S.W.2d 948, 949",Tex.,1990,Distinguished — addressed res judicata when cause of action not recognized until after first judgment; not applicable where claims existed and were directly ruled on,Pohl
963,67,Sw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Mktg. on Hold Inc.,"308 S.W.3d 909, 916",Tex.,2010,Assignments may be invalidated on public policy grounds,Pohl
964,67,"PPG Indus., Inc. v. JMB/Houston Centers Partners Ltd. P'ship","146 S.W.3d 79, 87",Tex.,2004,Assignability of most claims does not mean all are assignable; exceptions may be required due to equity and public policy,Pohl
965,67,Texas Ethics Opinion No. 670,March 2018,,2018,Attorney can use copies of former client documents as forms in new firm provided confidential information kept confidential,Pohl