citation_id,filing_id,case_name,citation,court,year,proposition,cited_by
966,68,"Columbia Rio Grande Healthcare, L.P. v. Hawley","284 S.W.3d 851, 862",Tex.,2009,Jury presumed to have followed court's instructions,Pohl
967,68,USAA Tex. Lloyds Co. v. Menchaca,"545 S.W.3d 479, 509, 518-19",Tex.,2018,Court must harmonize jury findings; party relying on conflicting answers bears burden to object before discharge; same error-preservation for incomplete and conflicting verdicts,Pohl
968,68,Bender v. S. Pac. Transp. Co.,"600 S.W.2d 257, 260",Tex.,1980,Court must reasonably construe jury findings to harmonize them,Pohl
969,68,Luna v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co.,"724 S.W.2d 383, 384",Tex.,1987,Failure to reconcile answers in favor of verdict when possible is reversible error,Pohl
970,68,Jackson v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co.,"689 S.W.2d 408, 412",Tex.,1985,Even ambiguous jury findings must be interpreted to uphold verdict,Pohl
971,68,Redwine v. Peckinpaugh,"535 S.W.3d 44, 50-52",Tex. App.—Tyler,2017,Distinguished — single cause of action; court polled jury confirming non-unanimity; non-unanimity certificate directly conflicted with exemplary damages,Pohl
972,68,Stover v. ADM Milling Co.,"No. 05-17-00778-CV, 2018 WL 6818561, at *12",Tex. App.—Dallas,2018,Directly on point — exemplary damages legally sufficient despite lack of separate unanimity certificate for predicate questions when jury answered later questions predicated on unanimity,Pohl
973,68,Bruce v. Oscar Renda Contracting,"657 S.W.3d 453, 464",Tex. App.—El Paso,2022,General non-unanimity certificate not conclusive when jury permitted to answer some questions by 10-2 vote; jury presumed to follow unanimity instructions,Pohl
974,68,Bryan v. Papalia,"542 S.W.3d 676, 692-93",Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2017,Original non-unanimous verdict certificate does not provide basis for disregarding jury's unanimous answers when jury later clarified unanimity,Pohl
975,68,Burbage v. Burbage,"447 S.W.3d 249, 256",Tex.,2014,Party relying on conflicting answers to avoid exemplary damages bears burden to timely object,Pohl
976,68,Fleet v. Fleet,"711 S.W.2d 1, 3",Tex.,1986,Judgment not reversed unless party objects to incomplete verdict before jury discharged,Pohl
977,68,Continental Cas. Co. v. Street,"379 S.W.2d 648, 650",Tex.,1964,Failed to preserve error by not objecting to acceptance of jury verdict before discharge,Pohl
978,68,"Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP v. Nat'l Dev. & Research Corp.","299 S.W.3d 106, 119-22",Tex.,2009,Attorney fees from separate proceedings may constitute actual damages even absent agreement between parties; overruled Martin-Simon on relevant point,Pohl
979,68,Sw. Energy Prod. Co. v. Berry-Helfand,"491 S.W.3d 699, 710",Tex.,2016,Flexible and imaginative approach applied to trade secret damages,Pohl
980,68,"World Wide Prosthetic Supply, Inc. v. Mikulsky","640 N.W.2d 764, 770",Wis.,2002,Actual loss is broad and encompasses tort damages where plaintiff proves loss caused by defendant's violation,Pohl
981,68,"Dunsmore & Associates, Ltd. v. D'Alessio","No. 409906, 2000 WL 124995, at *10",Conn. Super. Ct.,2000,Actual loss measured by how much better off plaintiff would have been but for misappropriation,Pohl
982,68,"Dixon Fin. Services, Ltd. v. Chang","325 S.W.3d 668, 678",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2010,Equitable principles allow recovery of attorney fees as actual damages when party required to defend prior action as consequence of wrongful act,Pohl
983,68,Naschke v. Gulf Coast Conference,187 S.W.3d 653,Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2006,No wholly innocent party element in tort of another doctrine,Pohl
984,68,"Brannan Paving GP, LLC v. Pavement Markings, Inc.",446 S.W.3d 14,Tex. App.—Corpus Christi,2013,No wholly innocent party element in tort of another,Pohl
985,68,Nguyen v. Watts,"605 S.W.3d 761, 789",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2020,Unjust enrichment arises from equitable principle — disgorges unjust gains rather than compensating for loss,Pohl
986,68,"Villarreal v. Grant Geophysical, Inc.","136 S.W.3d 265, 270",Tex. App.—San Antonio,2004,Unjust enrichment is equitable remedy for restitution,Pohl
987,68,"Agear Corp. v. Electro Circuits Int'l, LLC","580 S.W.3d 136, 142",Tex.,2019,"Civil conspiracy is theory of vicarious liability, not independent tort",Pohl
988,68,Guillory v. Dietrich,"598 S.W.3d 284, 296",Tex. App.—Dallas,2020,Rejected premise that Chapter 33 superseded rule that civil conspiracy findings result in joint and several liability,Pohl
989,68,Stephens v. Three Finger Black Shale P'ship,"580 S.W.3d 687, 719",Tex. App.—Eastland,2019,Joint and several liability attaches to civil conspiracy finding and is not affected by proportionate responsibility statutes,Pohl
990,68,"Whitlock v. CSI Risk Mgmt., LLC","No. 05-19-01297-CV, 2021 WL 1712215, at *13",Tex. App.—Dallas,2021,Conspiracy finding supported by underlying tort of misappropriation of trade secrets — Texas trial courts continue to submit both,Pohl
991,68,Harding v. Lewis,"133 S.W.3d 693, 698",Tex. App.—Corpus Christi,2003,Heavy burden to show evidence so weak as to be clearly wrong and manifestly unjust,Pohl
992,68,Home Ins. Co. v. Garcia,74 S.W.3d 52,Tex. App.—El Paso,2002,Court should not substitute its evaluation for jury's unless verdict is manifestly unjust,Pohl
993,68,"LaCore Enters., LLC v. Angles","2023 WL 2607562, at *9",Tex. App.—Dallas,2023,Discussed in footnote — stands for non-controversial conclusion that fees from same lawsuit are not damages; Kassab misuses case,Pohl (rebutting Kassab's use)
994,68,O'Neal v. Dale,"2021 WL 210848, at *10",Tex. App.—Fort Worth,2021,Discussed in footnote — fees incurred in present lawsuit do not typically constitute damages,Pohl (rebutting Kassab's use)
995,68,"Woodhaven Partners, Ltd. v. Shamoun & Norman, L.L.P.","422 S.W.3d 821, 839",Tex. App.—Dallas,2014,Discussed in footnote — only damages were fees from defending same lawsuit,Pohl (rebutting Kassab's use)
996,68,Tana Oil & Gas Corp. v. McCall,"104 S.W.3d 80, 81",Tex.,2003,Discussed in footnote — not about attorney fee recovery; rejected value-of-time argument,Pohl (rebutting Kassab's use)
997,68,"Tex. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ray Ferguson Interests, Inc.","2006 WL 648834, at *8",Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.],2006,Discussed in footnote — employee time on depositions not damages in same lawsuit,Pohl (rebutting Kassab's use)
998,68,Martin-Simon v. Womack,"68 S.W.3d 793, 797",Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.],2001,Discussed in footnote — Kassab cites for 'fees only recoverable by agreement' but this is in direct conflict with Akin Gump (subsequently),Pohl (rebutting Kassab's use)
999,68,Riner v. Neumann,"353 S.W.3d 312, 322-23",Tex. App.—Dallas,2011,Discussed in footnote — Kassab falsely cites as refusing tort of another; case actually dealt with American rule for same-case fees and does not mention tort of another,Pohl (rebutting Kassab's use)