Case Citations

999 case law citations with propositions — what each case was cited for

Data license: Public court records

23 rows where filing_id = 10

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: court, year

cited_by 1

citation_id ▼ filing_id case_name citation court year proposition cited_by
46 10 10 Humphreys v. Caldwell 888 S.W.2d 469 Texas Supreme Court 1994 An affidavit must be based on the affiant's personal knowledge and must state that the facts in it are true Kassab
47 10 10 Radio Station KSCS v. Jennings 750 S.W.2d 760 Texas Supreme Court 1988 Affidavit must show witness has personal knowledge under Tex. R. Evid. 602 Kassab
48 10 10 Burke v. Satterfield 525 S.W.2d 950 Texas Supreme Court 1975 An affidavit must contain direct and unequivocal statements that, if false, would be grounds for perjury Kassab
49 10 10 Hall v. Stephenson 919 S.W.2d 454 Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996 Affidavit must contain statements that would be grounds for perjury if false Kassab
50 10 10 Freeman v. American Motorists Ins. 53 S.W.3d 710 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001 Six elements required to introduce a business record through a witness under Tex. R. Evid. 803(6) Kassab
51 10 10 Ryland Group, Inc. v. Hood 924 S.W.2d 120 Texas Supreme Court 1996 Conclusory affidavits do not raise fact issues and are incompetent evidence as a matter of law Kassab
52 10 10 Stephens v. Precision Drilling Oilfield Servs. Corp. 2013 WL 1928797 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2013 Conclusory affidavits are incompetent evidence as a matter of law Kassab
53 10 10 Dolcefino v. Randolph 19 S.W.3d 906 Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000 A conclusory statement is one that does not provide the underlying facts to support the conclusion Kassab
54 10 10 E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Shell Oil Co. 259 S.W.3d 800 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007 An affidavit is conclusory when it expresses a factual inference without stating the underlying facts on which the inference is based Kassab
55 10 10 Game Sys. v. Forbes Hutton Leasing, Inc. 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 4098 Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011 Statement that software 'constitutes a trade secret' was conclusory and not proper evidence Kassab
56 10 10 McCollum v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Tr. Co. 481 S.W.3d 352 Tex. App.—El Paso 2015 Conclusory statements that conduct is 'allegedly wrongful' are insufficient to raise a fact issue Kassab
57 10 10 Celtic Props., L.C. v. Cleveland Reg'l Med. Ctr., L.P. 2015 WL 4600661 Tex. App.—Beaumont 2015 Statement that property was 'damaged' as a result of defendant's conduct was insufficient as a matter of law Kassab
58 10 10 Chapa v. Stonehaven Dev., Inc. 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 10159 Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2013 Statement 'we lost the profits we would have made' is conclusory because it provides no underlying facts to support the conclusion Kassab
59 10 10 Fraud-Tech, Inc. v. Choicepoint, Inc. 2006 WL 1030189 Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2006 Affidavit testimony that appellants were damaged because of alleged conversion was conclusory when affiant did not supply facts underlying its conclusions Kassab
60 10 10 Plas-Tex, Inc. v. Jones 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 3188 Tex. App.—Austin 2000 Conclusory statements regarding value of unidentified trade secrets were insufficient to support claim of damages Kassab
61 10 10 Methodist Hosp. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co. 329 S.W.3d 510 Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2009 Bare assertion that opposing party's conduct was the 'causal connection' of damages was conclusory, 'substantively defective,' and no more than affiant's subjective opinion Kassab
62 10 10 In Re Kenneth George (consolidated with In Re Epic Holdings, Inc.) 28 S.W.3d 511 Texas Supreme Court 2000 The attorney is the agent of the client, and the work product generated by the attorney in representing the client belongs to the client Kassab
63 10 10 Hebisen v. State 615 S.W.2d 866 Tex. Civ. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1981 Contents of a client's file must be turned over to the client promptly upon request Kassab
64 10 10 Resolution Trust Corp. v. H--, P.C. 128 FRD 647 N.D. Tex. 1989 Attorney may retain a copy of the file at attorney's expense, but the original file belongs to the client Kassab
65 10 10 Nolan v. Foreman 665 F.2d 738 U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 1982 Client file belongs to the client; rehearing denied at 671 F.2d 1380 Kassab
66 10 10 Smith v. State 490 S.W.2d 902 Tex. Civ. App.—Corpus Christi 1972 Failure to turn over client files is willful and malicious and constitutes dishonorable conduct; retention only permitted to secure a debt if not prejudicial to client Kassab
67 10 10 Castleman v. Internet Money Ltd. 546 S.W.3d 684 Texas Supreme Court 2018 Four-part test for TCPA commercial speech exception; party asserting exemption bears burden of proving applicability; exception requires conduct arise out of sale of goods/services in a commercial transaction Kassab
68 10 10 Schimmel v. McGregor 438 S.W.3d 847 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014 The party asserting the commercial speech exemption bears the burden of proving its applicability Kassab

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE citations (
    citation_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    case_name TEXT,
    citation TEXT,
    court TEXT,
    year INTEGER,
    proposition TEXT,
    cited_by TEXT
);