Case Citations

999 case law citations with propositions — what each case was cited for

Data license: Public court records

34 rows where filing_id = 16

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: court, year

cited_by 1

citation_id ▼ filing_id case_name citation court year proposition cited_by
90 16 16 Walker v. Williamson 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61185 S.D. Miss. 2016 Background of the Federal Court Case involving Pohl, Precision, Walker, and Ladner Kassab
91 16 16 Walker v. Williamson 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59031 S.D. Miss. 2017 Runners contracted with Pohl to provide marketing services for automobile rollover claims Kassab
92 16 16 Walker v. Williamson 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76488 S.D. Miss. 2016 Runners procured thousands of BP claims and motor vehicle cases but Pohl did not pay agreed share Kassab
93 16 16 Kassab v. Pohl 612 S.W.3d 571 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2020 First Court of Appeals opinion characterizing Pohl's claims and Kassab's conduct; Runners paid over $5 million in 'barratry pass-through money'; Kassab's conduct arose from commercial transaction involving legal services; intended audience were potential clients with barratry claims Kassab
94 16 16 Tex. Dep't of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda 133 S.W.3d 217 Texas Supreme Court 2004 Purpose of summary judgment is to eliminate patently unmeritorious claims Kassab
95 16 16 Lujan v. Navistar, Inc. 555 S.W.3d 79 Texas Supreme Court 2018 Traditional summary judgment standard — no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law Kassab
96 16 16 Maldonado v. Maldonado 556 S.W.3d 407 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2018 Burden shifts to nonmovant to raise genuine issue of material fact Kassab
97 16 16 Ford Motor Co. v. Ridgway 135 S.W.3d 598 Texas Supreme Court 2004 Genuine issue of material fact exists if more than a scintilla of evidence is produced Kassab
98 16 16 Schlumberger Tech. Corp. v. Pasko 544 S.W.3d 830 Texas Supreme Court 2018 Defendant moving for summary judgment on limitations must conclusively establish the defense elements; cause of action accrues when tortious act was committed or facts authorize seeking judicial remedy Kassab
99 16 16 KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison Cnty. Hous. Fin. Corp. 988 S.W.2d 746 Texas Supreme Court 1999 Defendant must conclusively prove when cause of action accrued and negate discovery rule Kassab
100 16 16 United Healthcare Servs., Inc. v. First St. Hosp. LP 570 S.W.3d 323 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2018 Cause of action accrues when tortious act was committed and caused injury, or facts come into existence authorizing judicial remedy Kassab
101 16 16 Provident Life & Acc. Ins. Co. v. Knott 128 S.W.3d 211 Texas Supreme Court 2003 Determining accrual date is a question of law Kassab
102 16 16 Burns v. Rochon 190 S.W.3d 263 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006 Statute of limitations for conversion is two years from date property is allegedly taken Kassab
103 16 16 Agar Corp., Inc. v. Electro Circuits Int'l, LLC 580 S.W.3d 136 Texas Supreme Court 2019 Civil conspiracy limitations follows underlying claims; trade secret and conspiracy claims barred when injury from sale was known more than three years before suit Kassab
104 16 16 Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co. 348 S.W.3d 194 Texas Supreme Court 2011 Statute of limitations begins running upon actual knowledge of wrongful injury, even without knowing specific cause, responsible party, full extent, or chances of avoidance Kassab
105 16 16 Comput. Assocs. Int'l Inc. v. Altai, Inc. 918 S.W.2d 453 Texas Supreme Court 1996 Plaintiff need not know he has a cause of action; must only know facts giving rise to the cause of action Kassab
106 16 16 Sw. Energy Prod. Co. v. Berry-Helfand 491 S.W.3d 699 Texas Supreme Court 2016 Trade secret limitations begins when plaintiff should have known facts leading to discovery of misappropriation through reasonable diligence Kassab
107 16 16 Tavana v. GTE Sw. 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 5365 Tex. App.—Dallas 1999 Suit for trade secret misappropriation barred when plaintiff knew trade secrets had been misappropriated Kassab
108 16 16 Target Strike, Inc. v. Marston & Marston Inc. 524 F. App'x 939 5th Cir. 2013 Trade secret claim barred when defendant's conduct led plaintiff to believe confidential information had been misappropriated Kassab
109 16 16 Barr v. Resolution Tr. Corp. 837 S.W.2d 627 Texas Supreme Court 1992 Res judicata prevents relitigation of claims finally adjudicated and related matters that should have been litigated in prior suit; subsequent suit barred if arising from same subject matter Kassab
110 16 16 Travelers Ins. Co. v. Joachim 315 S.W.3d 860 Texas Supreme Court 2010 Three elements of res judicata: prior final judgment, identity of parties or those in privity, same claims as raised or could have been raised Kassab
111 16 16 Palaxar Grp., LLC v. Williams 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138533 M.D. Fla. 2014 Conspirators deemed to be in privity for res judicata purposes Kassab
112 16 16 Seenyur v. Coolidge 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5895 D. Minn. 2018 Members of a conspiracy are deemed under the law to be in privity with each other Kassab
113 16 16 RSM Prod. Corp. v. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP 800 F. Supp. 2d 182 D.D.C. 2011 Conspirators deemed in privity for res judicata purposes Kassab
114 16 16 Madera Production Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co. 107 S.W.3d 652 Tex. App.—Texarkana 2003 Failure to add new parties to prior federal proceeding involving similar subject matter cannot be remedied by subsequent state court action Kassab
115 16 16 Holloway v. Starnes 840 S.W.2d 14 Tex. App.—Dallas 1992 Res judicata summary judgment affirmed when factual allegations from prior litigation used to support new conspiracy lawsuit Kassab
116 16 16 Youngkin v. Hines 546 S.W.3d 675 Texas Supreme Court 2018 Attorney is immune from liability to nonclients for conduct within scope of representation; inquiry focuses on kind of conduct, not alleged wrongfulness; acquisition of clients and filing lawsuits are protected actions facilitating legal services Kassab
117 16 16 Cantey Hanger, LLP v. Byrd 467 S.W.3d 477 Texas Supreme Court 2015 Attorney conduct may be wrongful but still fall within scope of client representation; immunity not limited to litigation context; conduct after litigation ended still protected Kassab
118 16 16 Bethel v. Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Winslett & Moser, P.C. 595 S.W.3d 651 Texas Supreme Court 2020 Criminal conduct is not categorically excepted from attorney civil immunity when connected with representing a client Kassab
119 16 16 Highland Capital Mgmt., LP v. Looper Reed & McGraw, P.C. 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 442 Tex. App.—Dallas 2016 Claims for illegal acquisition and use of stolen proprietary information dismissed on attorney immunity when conduct fell within scope of representation in the lawsuit; characterizing conduct as fraudulent or wrongful is immaterial to immunity evaluation Kassab
120 16 16 Haynes & Boone, LLP v. NFTD, LLC 2021 Tex. LEXIS 423 Texas Supreme Court 2021 Attorney immunity applies to claims based on conduct outside the litigation context Kassab
121 16 16 Santiago v. Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, P.C. 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 2092 Tex. App.—Dallas 2017 Texas courts have noted attorney immunity applies outside of the litigation context Kassab
122 16 16 Sacks v. Hall 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 12570 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014 Attorney not liable for filing confidential medical records because it did not constitute action foreign to duties of an attorney Kassab
123 16 16 Bradt v. West 892 S.W.2d 56 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992 Attorney does not have a right of recovery against another attorney arising from conduct engaged in as part of discharge of duties representing a party Kassab

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE citations (
    citation_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    case_name TEXT,
    citation TEXT,
    court TEXT,
    year INTEGER,
    proposition TEXT,
    cited_by TEXT
);