Case Citations

999 case law citations with propositions — what each case was cited for

Data license: Public court records

32 rows where filing_id = 18

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: court, year

cited_by 1

citation_id ▼ filing_id case_name citation court year proposition cited_by
142 18 18 Ryland Group, Inc. v. Hood 924 S.W.2d 120 Tex. 1996 Conclusory affidavits do not raise fact issues and are incompetent evidence; interested witness's affidavit stating 'estimates' or 'believes' will not support summary judgment Kassab
143 18 18 Stephens v. Precision Drilling Oilfield Servs. Corp. 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 5700 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2013 Conclusory affidavits do not raise fact issues Kassab
144 18 18 Dolcefino v. Randolph 19 S.W.3d 906 Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000 A conclusory statement does not provide the underlying facts to support the conclusion Kassab
145 18 18 E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Shell Oil Co. 259 S.W.3d 800 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007 An affidavit is conclusory when it expresses a factual inference without stating underlying facts Kassab
146 18 18 Bavishi v. Sterling Air Conditioning, Inc. 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 6271 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2011 Bare conclusions are not evidence and are not probative of any facts Kassab
147 18 18 In re Cook 597 S.W.3d 589 Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2020 A client owns the contents of his or her file — contradicts Pohl's claim to own client file contents Kassab
148 18 18 Game Sys. v. Forbes Hutton Leasing, Inc. 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 4098 Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011 Statement that software 'constitutes a trade secret' was conclusory and not proper evidence Kassab
149 18 18 Essex Ins. Co. v. Mason Bros. Constr., Inc. 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 5740 Tex. App.—Amarillo 2004 Statement that 'it appears' some fact occurred was conclusory Kassab
150 18 18 McIntire v. Ramirez 109 S.W.3d 741 Tex. 2003 Affidavit must be clear, positive and direct Kassab
151 18 18 Trico Techs. v. Montiel 949 S.W.2d 308 Tex. 1997 Interested witness's testimony must be clear, positive, direct, credible, free from contradiction and uncontroverted to establish facts Kassab
152 18 18 Casso v. Brand 776 S.W.2d 551 Tex. 1989 Testimony not meeting requirements of being clear, positive, direct will not support summary judgment Kassab
153 18 18 Laidlaw Waste Sys. v. City of Wilmer 904 S.W.2d 656 Tex. 1995 Witness found not competent to testify when making only conclusory statements (property metes and bounds) Kassab
154 18 18 Humphreys v. Caldwell 888 S.W.2d 469 Tex. 1994 Affidavit must be based on personal knowledge and state that facts are true and correct Kassab
155 18 18 Kerlin v. Arias 274 S.W.3d 666 Tex. 2008 Affidavit did not show how witness could have personal knowledge of particular events Kassab
156 18 18 Radio Station KSCS v. Jennings 750 S.W.2d 760 Tex. 1988 Affidavit did not show how witness became familiar with facts about operation Kassab
157 18 18 United Healthcare Servs., Inc. v. First St. Hosp. LP 570 S.W.3d 323 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2018 Cause of action accrues when tortious act was committed and caused injury or facts come into existence authorizing judicial remedy Kassab
158 18 18 Schlumberger Tech. Corp. v. Pasko 544 S.W.3d 830 Tex. 2018 Cause of action accrues even if all resulting damages have not yet occurred Kassab
159 18 18 Woods v. William M. Mercer, Inc. 769 S.W.2d 515 Tex. 1988 Party seeking to avail itself of the discovery rule must plead the rule Kassab
160 18 18 Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. Horwood 58 S.W.3d 732 Tex. 2001 Discovery rule only applies when subject matter is inherently undiscoverable and objectively verifiable Kassab
161 18 18 Palaxar Grp., LLC v. Williams 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138533 M.D. Fla. 2014 Conspirators deemed in privity for res judicata purposes Kassab
162 18 18 Seenyur v. Coolidge 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5895 D. Minn. 2018 Members of a conspiracy are deemed under the law to be in privity with each other Kassab
163 18 18 RSM Prod. Corp. v. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP 800 F. Supp. 2d 182 D.D.C. 2011 Conspirators in privity for res judicata purposes Kassab
164 18 18 SED Holdings, L.L.C. v. TM Prop. Sols., L.L.C. (In re 3 Star Props., L.L.C.) 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 22430 5th Cir. 2021 Additional authority supporting conspiracy-privity theory Kassab
165 18 18 Youngkin v. Hines 546 S.W.3d 675 Tex. 2018 Attorney immune from liability to nonclients for conduct within scope of representation; inquiry focuses on kind of conduct not alleged wrongfulness; merely labeling conduct fraudulent does not remove it from scope; acquisition of clients and filing of lawsuits are protected actions Kassab
166 18 18 Cantey Hanger, LLP v. Byrd 467 S.W.3d 477 Tex. 2015 Attorney conduct may be wrongful but still fall within scope of client representation; immunity not limited to litigation context; majority of cases arise in litigation context but not universally Kassab
167 18 18 Bethel v. Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Winslett & Moser, P.C. 595 S.W.3d 651 Tex. 2020 Criminal conduct not categorically excepted from attorney civil immunity when connected with representing client in litigation Kassab
168 18 18 Highland Capital Mgmt., LP v. Looper Reed & McGraw, P.C. 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 442 Tex. App.—Dallas 2016 Claims for illegal acquisition of stolen proprietary information dismissed on attorney immunity; characterizing conduct as wrongful is immaterial to evaluation of the immunity defense Kassab
169 18 18 Kassab v. Pohl 612 S.W.3d 571 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2020 Characterized Kassab's conduct as 'statements or conduct that arose out of a commercial transaction involving the type of legal services Kassab provides'; intended audience were potential clients to whom Kassab offered legal services; this is the law of the case per Kassab Kassab
170 18 18 Haynes & Boone, LLP v. NFTD, LLC 2021 Tex. LEXIS 423 Tex. 2021 Attorney immunity applies to claims based on conduct outside the litigation context Kassab
171 18 18 Santiago v. Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, P.C. 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 2092 Tex. App.—Dallas 2017 Texas courts have recognized attorney immunity applies outside of the litigation context Kassab
172 18 18 Sacks v. Hall 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 12570 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014 Attorney not liable for filing confidential records; not action foreign to duties of attorney Kassab
173 18 18 Bradt v. West 892 S.W.2d 56 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992 Attorney does not have a right of recovery against another attorney for conduct in discharge of duties representing a party Kassab

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE citations (
    citation_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    case_name TEXT,
    citation TEXT,
    court TEXT,
    year INTEGER,
    proposition TEXT,
    cited_by TEXT
);