Case Citations

999 case law citations with propositions — what each case was cited for

Data license: Public court records

29 rows where filing_id = 60

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: court, year

citation_id ▼ filing_id case_name citation court year proposition cited_by
711 60 60 Columbia Rio Grande Healthcare, L.P. v. Hawley 284 S.W.3d 851 Tex. 2009 The jury is presumed to have followed the court's instructions Pohl
712 60 60 USAA Tex. Lloyds Co. v. Menchaca 545 S.W.3d 479 Tex. 2018 Court must reasonably construe jury findings to harmonize them; Rule 295 governs incomplete and conflicting verdicts; to preserve error based on fatally conflicting jury answers, parties must raise objection before trial court discharges jury; party relying on conflicting answer bore burden to object Pohl
713 60 60 Bender v. S. Pac. Transp. Co. 600 S.W.2d 257 Tex. 1980 Court must reasonably construe jury findings in way that harmonizes them Pohl
714 60 60 Luna v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. 724 S.W.2d 383 Tex. 1987 Failure to reconcile answers in favor of jury's verdict when possible is reversible error Pohl
715 60 60 Jackson v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co. 689 S.W.2d 408 Tex. 1985 Even where jury findings are ambiguous or unclear, court must try to interpret findings to uphold verdict Pohl
716 60 60 Redwine v. Peckinpaugh 535 S.W.3d 44 Tex. App.—Tyler 2017 When party contends exemplary damages not supported by unanimous finding, reviewed as no-evidence point; distinguished by Pohl — involved single cause of action and actual jury polling confirming non-unanimity Pohl
717 60 60 Stover v. ADM Milling Co. No. 05-17-00778-CV, 2018 WL 6818561 Tex. App.—Dallas 2018 Evidence legally sufficient to support exemplary damages even though predicate questions not separately certified as unanimous, because jury later unanimously answered questions predicated on those answers; jury presumed to follow instructions Pohl
718 60 60 Bruce v. Oscar Renda Contracting 657 S.W.3d 453 Tex. App.—El Paso 2022 Jury instructed to only answer if unanimous is presumed to have followed instructions; general non-unanimity certificate does not conflict with exemplary damages when not all verdict needed to be unanimous; distinguished Redwine on that basis Pohl
719 60 60 Bryan v. Papalia 542 S.W.3d 676 Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2017 Where jury failed to sign unanimity certificate but court's instructions required unanimity, trial court sent jury back to clarify; original verdict certificate does not provide basis for disregarding jury's answer when jury later clarified; illustrates proper procedure Kassab should have followed Pohl
720 60 60 Fleet v. Fleet 711 S.W.2d 1 Tex. 1986 Judgment will not be reversed unless party objects to incomplete verdict before jury is discharged Pohl
721 60 60 Continental Cas. Co. v. Street 379 S.W.2d 648 Tex. 1964 Party failed to preserve error by not objecting to acceptance of jury verdict as incomplete before jury discharged Pohl
722 60 60 Burbage v. Burbage 447 S.W.3d 249 Tex. 2014 Party relying on asserted conflict to avoid exemplary damages bears burden to timely object Pohl
723 60 60 Sw. Energy Prod. Co. v. Berry-Helfand 491 S.W.3d 699 Tex. 2016 A flexible and imaginative approach is applied to calculation of damages in misappropriation-of-trade-secrets cases Pohl
724 60 60 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP v. National Development & Research Corp. 299 S.W.3d 106 Tex. 2009 Attorneys' fees from separate proceedings may constitute actual damages; fee award could be proper even absent agreement between parties; effectively overrules Martin-Simon on this point Pohl
725 60 60 World Wide Prosthetic Supply, Inc. v. Mikulsky 640 N.W.2d 764 Wis. 2002 Definition of actual loss under Uniform Trade Secrets Act is broad and encompasses tort damages where plaintiff must prove loss was caused by defendant's violation Pohl
726 60 60 Dunsmore & Associates, Ltd. v. D'Alessio No. 409906, 2000 WL 124995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2000 Actual loss means amount of money plaintiff lost from defendant's misappropriation; measured by how much better off plaintiff would have been but for the misappropriation Pohl
727 60 60 Dixon Fin. Services, Ltd. v. Chang 325 S.W.3d 668 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2010 Equitable principles allow recovery of attorney's fees as actual damages when party required to prosecute or defend prior legal action as consequence of defendant's wrongful act Pohl
728 60 60 Lacore Enters., LLC v. Angles No. 05-21-00798-CV, 2023 WL 2607562 Tex. App.—Dallas 2023 Distinguished by Pohl — stands for non-controversial conclusion that fees from the same lawsuit are not recoverable as damages under the American rule Pohl (distinguishing)
729 60 60 O'Neal v. Dale No. 02-20-00173-CV, 2021 WL 210848 Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2021 Distinguished by Pohl — stands for uncontroversial proposition that fees incurred in the present lawsuit do not typically constitute damages Pohl (distinguishing)
730 60 60 Woodhaven Partners, Ltd. v. Shamoun & Norman, L.L.P. 422 S.W.3d 821 Tex. App.—Dallas 2014 Distinguished by Pohl — concerned damages consisting of fees in defending against same lawsuit and prosecuting counterclaims Pohl (distinguishing)
731 60 60 Tana Oil & Gas Corp. v. McCall 104 S.W.3d 80 Tex. 2003 Distinguished by Pohl — rejected argument about value of parties' own time; did not concern attorney fees recovery Pohl (distinguishing)
732 60 60 Tex. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ray Ferguson Interests, Inc. No. 01-02-00807-CV, 2006 WL 648834 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006 Distinguished by Pohl — concerned financial loss from employee time on depositions in same lawsuit, not attorney fees from separate proceedings Pohl (distinguishing)
733 60 60 Martin-Simon v. Womack 68 S.W.3d 793 Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2001 Cited by Kassab for proposition fees only recoverable by agreement; Pohl argues this was effectively overruled by Akin Gump (2009) Pohl (distinguishing)
734 60 60 Riner v. Neumann 353 S.W.3d 312 Tex. App.—Dallas 2011 Pohl argues Kassab's citation is false — Riner does not mention tort of another doctrine; it addressed American Rule on same-case fees Pohl (distinguishing)
735 60 60 Naschke v. Gulf Coast Conference 187 S.W.3d 653 Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2006 Cited in footnote 10 regarding tort of another doctrine Pohl (footnote)
736 60 60 Brannan Paving GP, LLC v. Pavement Markings, Inc. 446 S.W.3d 14 Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2013 Cited in footnote 10 — Pohl argues Kassab's own cited cases demonstrate no wholly innocent party element to tort of another Pohl (footnote)
737 60 60 Guillory v. Dietrich 598 S.W.3d 284 Tex. App.—Dallas 2020 Rejected the premise that Chapter 33 superseded the rule that civil conspiracy findings result in joint and several liability Pohl
738 60 60 Stephens v. Three Finger Black Shale P'ship 580 S.W.3d 687 Tex. App.—Eastland 2019 Joint and several liability attaches to civil conspiracy finding and is not affected by proportionate responsibility statutes Pohl
739 60 60 Whitlock v. CSI Risk Mgmt., LLC No. 05-19-01297-CV, 2021 WL 1712215 Tex. App.—Dallas 2021 Conspiracy finding supported by underlying tort of misappropriation of trade secrets — TUTSA and conspiracy submitted together to jury Pohl

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE citations (
    citation_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    case_name TEXT,
    citation TEXT,
    court TEXT,
    year INTEGER,
    proposition TEXT,
    cited_by TEXT
);