Case Citations

999 case law citations with propositions — what each case was cited for

Data license: Public court records

82 rows where filing_id = 66

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: court

cited_by 1

citation_id ▼ filing_id case_name citation court year proposition cited_by
844 66 66 In the Interest of E.S. No. 02-20-00407-CV, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 4153, at *24 Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2021 Where witness willfully testifies falsely regarding material fact, new trial may be granted Kassab
845 66 66 In re Marriage of Hutcherson 2019 Tex. App. LEXIS 8719, at *10 Tex. App. 2019 Judgment vacated when award based on false testimony and fact finder was deceived on material issue Kassab
846 66 66 Dixie Gas & Fuel Co. v. Jacobs 47 S.W.2d 457, 462 Tex. Civ. App.—Beaumont 1932 Where affidavits showed judgment based on perjury, trial court erred in denying new trial Kassab
847 66 66 Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc. 733 F.2d 509, 521-522 8th Cir. 1984 Abuse of discretion to fail to grant new trial based on newly discovered evidence of witness payment for false testimony Kassab
848 66 66 In re George 28 S.W.3d 511, 516 Tex. 2000 Attorney is agent of client; work product belongs to client Kassab
849 66 66 In re McCann 422 S.W.3d 701, 706 Tex. Crim. App. 2013 Lien is transitory interest in someone else's property; attorney asserting lien never owns property Kassab
850 66 66 Fmc Techs. v. Murphy No. 01-21-00455-CV, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 5984, at *62 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2023 Must prove competitive advantage for independent economic value Kassab
851 66 66 Tex. Comm'n on Human Rights v. Morrison 381 S.W.3d 533, 537 Tex. 2012 Broad-form question cannot put before jury issues with no basis in law or evidence; appealing party need not prove jury relied on invalid theory Kassab
852 66 66 Title Source, Inc. v. HouseCanary, Inc. 612 S.W.3d 517, 531 Tex. App.—San Antonio 2020 Theories not supported by evidence should be omitted from improper means definition submitted to jury Kassab
853 66 66 Crown Life Ins. Co. v. Casteel 22 S.W.3d 378, 389 Tex. 2000 Inclusion of invalid theories in broad-form charge constitutes harmful error Kassab
854 66 66 Gen. Universal Sys. v. HAL Inc. 500 F.3d 444, 451 5th Cir. 2007 TUTSA explicitly precludes treating trade secret misappropriation as continuing tort Kassab
855 66 66 Sw. Energy Prod. Co. v. Berry-Helfand 491 S.W.3d 699, 710-11, 721-22 Tex. 2016 Cause of action accrues when trade secret actually used; recoverable losses defined; damages cannot be based on sheer speculation Kassab
856 66 66 Agar Corp., Inc. v. Electro Circuits Int'l, LLC 580 S.W.3d 136, 145-46 Tex. 2019 Rejected last-overt-act rule; conspiracy claim accrues when underlying tort accrues; claims against co-conspirators accrue on same date as first overt act Kassab
857 66 66 Harang v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. 400 S.W.2d 810, 813 Tex. Civ. App.—Houston 1966 Limitations runs from when injury occurs; conspiracy claim against late-added co-conspirator time-barred Kassab
858 66 66 Elbaor v. Smith 845 S.W.2d 240, 243 Tex. 1992 Substantive, non-discretionary directive requiring courts to submit requested questions if pleadings and evidence support them Kassab
859 66 66 Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Johnson 9 S.W. 602, 602-03 Tex. 1888 No action lies to recover damages if plaintiff requires aid from illegal transaction Kassab
860 66 66 Sharpe v. Turley 191 S.W.3d 362, 366 Tex. App.—Dallas 2006 If illegal act inextricably intertwined with claim and damages would not have occurred but for illegal act, plaintiff cannot recover Kassab
861 66 66 McNally v. McNally No. 02-18-00142-CV, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 7211, at *27 Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2020 Unlawful acts doctrine applies without criminal conviction if conduct was in fact illegal Kassab
862 66 66 Bartnicki v. Vopper 532 U.S. 514, 539 U.S. 2001 Trade secret law permits disclosures relevant to public health/safety, crime, or substantial public concern Kassab
863 66 66 Alderson v. United States 718 F. Supp. 2d 1186, 1200 C.D. Cal. 2010 There cannot be any trade secret about ongoing illegality Kassab
864 66 66 Sys. Operations, Inc. v. Sci. Games Dev. Corp. 425 F. Supp. 130, 136 D.N.J. 1977 Disclosure of trade secret information may itself be privileged Kassab
865 66 66 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Medina 814 S.W.2d 71, 73 Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1991 Public policy strongly favors exposure of crime Kassab
866 66 66 Cluck v. Mecom 401 S.W.3d 110, 114 Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011 Fiduciary has affirmative duty to make full and accurate confession of fiduciary activities Kassab
867 66 66 R.R. Comm'n of Tex. v. Gulf Energy Expl. Corp. 482 S.W.3d 559, 566-71 Tex. 2016 Charge error on contested critical issue is generally harmful and reversible; trial court erred by failing to submit pled and evidence-supported affirmative defense Kassab
868 66 66 Fort Worth Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Palazzolo 498 S.W.3d 674, 686 Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2016 Trial court erred by refusing to submit properly supported affirmative defense Kassab
869 66 66 The State Bar v. Kilpatrick 874 S.W.2d 656, 657 Tex. 1994 Expert testimony on barratry issue permitted; disbarment rendered even absent criminal conviction Kassab
870 66 66 State v. Mercier 164 S.W.3d 799, 816 Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2005 Expert testimony about disciplinary rules and how conduct violated barratry rules properly admitted Kassab
871 66 66 Reynolds v. State No. 08-15-00373-CR, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 11059, at *15-16, 32-33 Tex. App.—El Paso 2017 Criminal barratry conviction upheld based on expert testimony on barratry statute and proper client solicitation Kassab
872 66 66 In re Christus Spohn Hosp. Kleberg 222 S.W.3d 434, 440 Tex. 2007 Expert may state opinion on mixed questions of law and fact Kassab
873 66 66 Mega Child Care v. Tex. Dep't of Protective & Regulatory Servs. 29 S.W.3d 303, 309 Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2000 Whether conduct meets fixed legal standard is mixed question of law and fact Kassab
874 66 66 H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. Bilotto 985 S.W.2d 22, 24 Tex. 1998 To be direct comment on weight of evidence, issue submitted must suggest trial court's opinion on the matter Kassab
875 66 66 Youngkin v. Hines 546 S.W.3d 675, 682 Tex. 2018 Filing lawsuits and pleadings fell within attorney immunity Kassab
876 66 66 Kassab v. Pohl 612 S.W.3d 571, 578 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2020 Kassab's conduct arose out of commercial transaction involving type of legal services he provides Kassab
877 66 66 K3 Enter., Inc. v. Sasowski No. 20-24441-CIV-CAN, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234206, at *10 S.D. Fla. 2022 Actual loss means lost profits, lost customers, lost market share Kassab
878 66 66 Fin. Info. Techs., LLC v. iControl Sys., USA, LLC 21 F.4th 1267, 1276 11th Cir. 2021 Actual loss understood as lost profits Kassab
879 66 66 Selectica, Inc. v. Novatus, Inc. No. 6:13-cv-1708-Orl-40TBS, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191940, at *9 M.D. Fla. 2015 Actual loss defined as lost profits, lost customers, lost market share Kassab
880 66 66 Saforo & Assocs., Inc. v. Porocel Corp. 991 S.W.2d 117, 124 Ark. 1999 Actual loss means plaintiff's lost profits or defendant's gain Kassab
881 66 66 GME, Inc. v. Carter 917 P.2d 754, 757 Idaho 1996 Anomaly to allow attorney fees as damages under trade secrets act Kassab
882 66 66 Twin Falls Staffing, LLC v. Visser (In re Visser) No. 1:13-cv-00408-BLW, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56705, at *9 D. Idaho 2014 Trade secret losses logically include lost profits but not attorney fees Kassab
883 66 66 Morgan v. Clements Fluids S. Tex., Ltd. 589 S.W.3d 177, 191 n.4 Tex. App.—Tyler 2018 Courts should look to other states' UTSA interpretations Kassab
884 66 66 Lacore Enters., LLC v. Angles No. 05-21-00798-CV, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 1926, at *32-33 Tex. App.—Dallas 2023 Attorney's fees incurred in a lawsuit are not actual damages Kassab
885 66 66 Martin-Simon v. Womack 68 S.W.3d 793, 797 Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2001 Fees from prior litigation generally not recoverable absent agreement Kassab
886 66 66 Tana Oil & Gas Corp. v. McCall 104 S.W.3d 80, 81-82 Tex. 2003 Attorney fees for defending different claim not recoverable as damages Kassab
887 66 66 O'Neal v. Dale No. 02-20-00173-CV, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 466, at *28 Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2021 Claim of incurring attorney fees to defend against another claim is not viable damage claim Kassab
888 66 66 Tex. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ray Ferguson Interests, Inc. No. 01-02-00807-CV, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 2001, at *23-24 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006 Financial loss due to time spent on litigation in another case not recoverable Kassab
889 66 66 Woodhaven Partners Ltd. v. Shamoun & Norman, L.L.P. 422 S.W.3d 821, 837 Tex. App.—Dallas 2014 Party relying on non-recoverable damages alone has presented legal barrier to recovery Kassab
890 66 66 Naschke v. Gulf Coast Conference 187 S.W.3d 653, 655 Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2006 Tort of another exception; court bound to follow existing law Kassab
891 66 66 Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. v. Nat'l Dev. & Research Corp. 299 S.W.3d 106, 119 Tex. 2009 Did not address whether tort of another exception should be adopted Kassab
892 66 66 Riner v. Neumann 353 S.W.3d 312, 323 Tex. App.—Dallas 2011 Declined to adopt tort of another exception Kassab
893 66 66 TOKA Gen. Contractors v. Wm. Rigg Co. No. 04-12-00474-CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 3776, at *20 Tex. App.—San Antonio 2014 Collecting cases declining tort of another Kassab
894 66 66 Per-Se Techs., Inc. v. Sybase, Inc. No. 01-03-01293-CV, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5096, at *24 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2005 Tort of another as equitable doctrine requires wholly innocent plaintiff Kassab
895 66 66 Enbridge Pipelines (E. Tex.) L.P. v. Avinger Timber, LLC 386 S.W.3d 256, 262 Tex. 2012 Trial court must act as evidentiary gatekeeper screening out irrelevant testimony Kassab
896 66 66 City of Harlingen v. Estate of Sharboneau 48 S.W.3d 177, 182 Tex. 2001 Market value = price property brings from willing seller to willing buyer Kassab
897 66 66 Pike v. Tex. EMC Mgmt., LLC 610 S.W.3d 763, 782, 784 & n.27 Tex. 2020 Purchase price alone cannot establish market value; plaintiff cannot leave jury to speculate on amount saved Kassab
898 66 66 InterFirst Bank Dall., N.A. v. Risser 739 S.W.2d 882, 891 Tex. App.—Texarkana 1987 One sale not sufficient to fix fair market value Kassab
899 66 66 Mo., K. & T. R. Co. v. Moss 135 S.W. 626, 627 Tex. Civ. App. 1911 Single sale admissible but not sufficient to establish market value Kassab
900 66 66 Szczepanik v. First S. Tr. Co. 883 S.W.2d 648, 649 Tex. 1994 Damages must be shown by competent evidence with reasonable certainty Kassab
901 66 66 Accurate Precision Plating, LLC v. Guerrero No. 01-14-00706-CV, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 12034, at *7, 9 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2015 Property owner may testify on value; but must be market value not intrinsic/speculative; owner of business could not testify to lost profits Kassab
902 66 66 Jatex Oil & Gas Expl. L.P. v. Nadel & Gussman Permian, L.L.C. 629 S.W.3d 397, 407 Tex. App.—Eastland 2020 Property owner rule does not extend to technical or specialized matters Kassab
903 66 66 Arkoma Basin Expl. Co. v. FMF Assocs. 1990-A, Ltd. 249 S.W.3d 380, 388 Tex. 2008 Technical/specialized valuation not a matter of common knowledge Kassab
904 66 66 Horizon Health Corp. v. Acadia Healthcare Co. 520 S.W.3d 848, 867 Tex. 2017 Must analyze malice evidence for each defendant separately, not grouped together Kassab
905 66 66 Safeshred, Inc. v. Martinez 365 S.W.3d 655, 665 Tex. 2012 Conduct necessary for liability cannot serve as basis for punitive damages; legally justified conduct not probative of malice Kassab
906 66 66 Eagle Oil & Gas Co. v. Shale Expl., LLC 549 S.W.3d 256, 285 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2018 No evidence of injury independent of misappropriation itself is insufficient for malice; if sufficient, exemplary damages would be routine rather than exceptional Kassab
907 66 66 Reynolds v. Sanchez Oil & Gas Corp. No. 01-18-00940-CV, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 8903, at *47-48 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2023 TUTSA preempts claims primarily based on misappropriation of trade secrets Kassab
908 66 66 VEST Safety Med. Servs., LLC v. Arbor Env't, LLC No. 4:20-CV-0812, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127285, at *10 S.D. Tex. 2022 Weight of authority demonstrates conspiracy claim preempted by TUTSA Kassab
909 66 66 In re YRC Inc. 646 S.W.3d 805, 809 Tex. 2022 Court required to grant leave to designate responsible third parties if timely motion pleads sufficient facts Kassab
910 66 66 Sanchez v. Castillo No. 05-18-01033-CV, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 1867, at *15 Tex. App.—Dallas 2020 Erroneous denial of responsible third party designation skews proceedings, affects outcome, compromises defense Kassab
911 66 66 Cheatham v. Pohl No. 01-20-00046-CV, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 6528 Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2022 Related pending barratry litigation against Pohl Kassab
912 66 66 Ginsberg v. Fifth Court of Appeals 686 S.W.2d 105, 106, 108 Tex. 1985 Offensive use doctrine — plaintiff cannot assert privilege to protect information materially relevant to defendant's defenses Kassab
913 66 66 In re Nat'l Lloyds Ins. Co. 532 S.W.3d 794, 807 Tex. 2017 Party may waive work-product privilege through offensive use by relying on billing records to recover attorney fees Kassab
914 66 66 In re Beirne, Maynard & Parsons, L.L.P. 260 S.W.3d 229, 231 Tex. App.—Texarkana 2008 Attorney cannot deny opposing party right to review documents supporting reimbursement claim Kassab
915 66 66 Remington Arms Co. v. Caldwell 850 S.W.2d 167, 170 Tex. 1993 Trial court has power during trial to sanction nondisclosure by excluding evidence Kassab
916 66 66 Marino v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 787 S.W.2d 948, 949-50 Tex. 1990 Res judicata does not apply if facts change and relationship between parties altered Kassab
917 66 66 Rohrmoos Venture v. UTSW DVA Healthcare, LLP 578 S.W.3d 469, 494, 501 Tex. 2019 General conclusory testimony devoid of real substance will not support fee award; without evidence of Disciplinary Rule 1.04 factors, fact finder has no meaningful way to determine reasonableness Kassab
918 66 66 Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equip. Corp. 945 S.W.2d 812, 818 Tex. 1997 Eight factors for reasonable attorney fees: time/labor, preclusion of other employment, customary fees, amount involved/results, time limitations, professional relationship, experience/reputation/ability, fixed/contingent fee Kassab
919 66 66 THB Constr., LLC v. Holt Tex., Ltd. No. 05-20-00020-CV, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 277, at *7-12 Tex. App.—Dallas 2022 Heavily redacted invoices fail to identify work performed; insufficient to support fee award Kassab
920 66 66 Stewart Title Guar. Co. v. Sterling 822 S.W.2d 1, 10 Tex. 1991 Fees must be shown incurred while suing party on claim that allows fee recovery Kassab
921 66 66 Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. v. Chapa 212 S.W.3d 299, 313 Tex. 2006 Must segregate recoverable from unrecoverable fees Kassab
922 66 66 Desio v. Bosque No. 05-21-00022-CV, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 1202, at *12 Tex. App.—Dallas 2022 General conclusory testimony insufficient to explain how services advanced both recoverable and unrecoverable claims Kassab
923 66 66 Yowell v. Granite Operating Co. 620 S.W.3d 335, 354-55 Tex. 2020 Conditional appellate fees require opinion testimony about services reasonably necessary to defend appeal and reasonable hourly rate Kassab
924 66 66 KBIDC Invs., LLC v. Zuru Toys Inc. No. 05-19-00159-CV, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 8055, at *63-65 Tex. App.—Dallas 2020 Conclusory testimony of lump-sum appellate fee amounts insufficient to support conditional appellate fee award Kassab
925 66 66 Jimmie Luecke Children P'ship v. Droemer No. 03-20-00096-CV, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 605, at *21 Tex. App.—Austin 2022 Conclusory appellate fee testimony insufficient Kassab

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE citations (
    citation_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    case_name TEXT,
    citation TEXT,
    court TEXT,
    year INTEGER,
    proposition TEXT,
    cited_by TEXT
);