defense_id,filing_id,defense
124,18,"Evidentiary objections seeking to strike Pohl's key summary judgment evidence as conclusory, hearsay, and lacking personal knowledge/authentication"
125,18,Statute of limitations — Pohl knew of Kassab's involvement in 2014; never pled discovery rule; office break-in not inherently undiscoverable
126,18,Res judicata — Pohl's own judicial admissions of conspiracy establish privity; same subject matter as Federal Court Case; Pohl's sworn testimony identifies same conduct
127,18,Attorney immunity — First Court of Appeals' characterization is law of the case; conduct falls within scope of attorney representation regardless of wrongfulness characterization; applies outside litigation context; even criminal conduct not categorically excepted