defense_id,filing_id,defense
156,23,Res judicata does not apply because material facts changed when Pohl filed suit against Kassab (Marino doctrine)
157,23,Logical inconsistency: Pohl cannot argue both different transaction (for § 16.069) and same transaction (for res judicata)
158,23,Section 16.069 revives the otherwise time-barred counterclaims
159,23,The Assignments are valid under Texas law — barratry claims are assignable
160,23,Judicial estoppel bars Pohl from arguing Assignments are invalid after arguing they were valid to the Texas Supreme Court
161,23,"Violations of Disciplinary Rules cannot void otherwise valid contracts (Wright v. Sydow, M.A. Mills v. Kotts)"
162,23,Rule 1.08(h) specifically allows liens to secure fees
163,23,Unclean hands — Pohl committed felony barratry and cannot invoke equitable considerations