defense_id,filing_id,defense
347,61,"Non-unanimous Q17 answer bars exemplary damages — burden on Pohl to secure proper findings, not on Kassab to object (Levine, Redwine, § 41.003(b))"
348,61,No court in any jurisdiction has awarded attorney's fees from other litigation as actual damages in a trade secret claim
349,61,Akin Gump's malpractice plaintiff exception does not apply to Pohl
350,61,Pohl's unclean hands (Q3 wrongful conduct) bar equitable tort of another remedy (Frazier v. Havens)
351,61,TUTSA preempts conspiracy claim per Reynolds v. Sanchez Oil & Gas Corp.
352,61,Precision's exoneration precludes Kassab's liability as a matter of law — no misappropriation upstream means no misappropriation downstream