defense_id,filing_id,defense
353,65,"No trade secret — client files belong to clients, not attorney (ownership)"
354,65,No trade secret — no independent economic value / no competitive advantage
355,65,No trade secret — no reasonable secrecy measures; information publicly available
356,65,No evidence of misappropriation — Precision finding breaks indirect misappropriation chain
357,65,No evidence Kassab knew information acquired by improper means
358,65,Claims barred by 3-year TUTSA statute of limitations (§ 16.010)
359,65,Unlawful acts doctrine — Pohl's barratry inextricably intertwined with claims
360,65,Privilege to disclose trade secrets to reveal fraud (Tex. R. Evid. 507(a))
361,65,Defense of Trade Secrets Act immunity for whistleblower disclosures (18 U.S.C. § 1833(b))
362,65,Common-law privilege for disclosures relevant to crime/public concern
363,65,Grievance immunity — absolute under Tex. R. Disc. P. 17.09
364,65,Judicial proceedings privilege — absolute for litigation/grievance communications
365,65,Attorney immunity — conduct within scope of representation
366,65,Unrecoverable damages — attorney fees from other litigation not 'actual loss' under TUTSA
367,65,Tort of another exception not adopted in Texas / unavailable to non-innocent plaintiff
368,65,"No evidence of fair market value for $250,000 Q7(2) award"
369,65,No evidence of development costs for Q7(3) award
370,65,No causation — Pohl's barratry was sole proximate cause
371,65,Clients' decisions to sue were superseding/intervening cause
372,65,Conspiracy preempted by TUTSA § 134A.007 displacement
373,65,Non-unanimous Q17 finding bars exemplary damages under Rule 292 / § 41.003(d)