defense_id,filing_id,defense
374,66,Newly discovered evidence of witness tampering/bribery (Walker 30% confession)
375,66,Factual insufficiency — Q1 trade secret ownership
376,66,Jury charge error — Q2 broad-form with unpled theories
377,66,Factual insufficiency — Q2 misappropriation (Precision finding)
378,66,Jury charge error — Q3 wrongful conduct untied to charge
379,66,Jury charge error — refused proportionate responsibility question
380,66,Jury charge error — Q5 limitations with 'by Kassab' limitation
381,66,Factual insufficiency — Q5 answer
382,66,Refusal to submit unlawful acts defense question
383,66,Refusal to submit immunity/privilege question
384,66,Exclusion of barratry expert testimony
385,66,Jury charge error — Q6 comment on weight of evidence
386,66,Factual insufficiency — Q6 attorney-client relationship
387,66,Q7(1) charge error — attorney fees not TUTSA damages
388,66,Property owner rule inapplicable to trade secret valuation
389,66,Factual insufficiency — Q7(2) fair market value and Q7(3) development costs
390,66,"Factual insufficiency — willful/malicious (Q8, Q17)"
391,66,Factual insufficiency — exemplary damages (Q19)
392,66,Conspiracy preempted by TUTSA
393,66,Denial of responsible third party designations
394,66,Denial of motion to abate (Cheatham v. Pohl)
395,66,Offensive use of privilege / withheld discovery
396,66,Dismissal of civil barratry counterclaims
397,66,Insufficiency of attorney fees evidence — conclusory expert testimony and redacted invoices