home / kassab_analytics

Menu
  • Search all tables

Evidence Referenced

769 evidence items cited in filings

Data license: Public court records

769 rows

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

evidence_id ▼ filing_id evidence
1 1 1 Confidential Settlement Agreement executed in late April/early May 2017 resolving federal lawsuit No. 1:14-cv-381-KS-JCG in the Southern District of Mississippi
2 2 2 Pohl's Original Petition (cited at pp. 6-7 regarding Pohl's judicial admissions about Kassab contacting clients and filing suits)
3 2 2 Magdalena Santana's September 24, 2016 affidavit describing Pohl's barratry scheme
4 2 2 Santana's December 19, 2017 affidavit (purported retraction of prior affidavit)
5 2 2 Santana's deposition testimony confirming facts in initial affidavit and describing $50,000 payment and gag agreement
6 2 2 Edgar Jaimes' deposition testimony about delivering $50,000 cash to Santana in bags marked 'trick or treat'
7 2 2 Kenneth 'Coach' Talley's sworn testimony about soliciting BP and auto accident clients for Pohl, including checklist with instructions
8 2 2 Scott Walker's testimony that payments were 'barratry' and he was 'a pass-through for barratry money'
9 2 2 Walker's indictment and imprisonment
10 2 2 Federal litigation in Mississippi styled No. 1:14-cv-381-KS-JCG (Walker/Seymour/Ladner/Precision v. Pohl and partners)
11 2 2 150 express assignments of interest from barratry claimants to Kassab
12 2 2 Pohl's judicial admissions in Harris County lawsuits that barratry is not legal malpractice and discovery rule does not apply
13 3 3 May 25, 2012 Public Relations Consulting Agreement and Operating Agreement between LOMAP, Maxwell & Walker Diamond Consulting, and Robinson Holdings (Complaint Exhibits 3-1, 3-2)
14 3 3 July 15, 2012 Operating Agreement between LOMAP, Ladner, Walker, and Seymour (Complaint Exhibit 3-2)
15 3 3 Exhibit 1-A: PR Consultants' claims in Federal Court Lawsuit alleging hourly-rate payment basis and denying entitlement to percentage of fees
16 3 3 Exhibit 1-B: Statements by Nicholson and Favre that PR Consultants admitted stealing from Pohl
17 3 3 Exhibit 1-C: Bogus invoices with 'PAID' stamps dated before invoice preparation dates
18 3 3 Exhibit 1-D: Cease and desist letter to Julia Porter and Monica Chaney
19 3 3 Exhibit 1-E: Second demand to Porter and Chaney regarding unauthorized use of Pohl's name
20 3 3 Exhibit 1-F: Christopher Forrest fee agreement bearing Pohl's name from May 2017
21 3 3 Exhibit 1-G: Pohl's disclaimer of interest regarding Shannon/Zubalik accident claims
22 3 3 Exhibit 10: Jimmy Williamson deposition (pp. 58-59) regarding 60/40 fee split
23 3 3 Exhibit 43 to Complaint: Fee agreement submitted by Complainant (Pohl asserts it does not appear prepared or signed by him)
24 3 3 Exhibit 39 to Complaint: Power of Attorney form (appears to be Pohl's form but not signed by him)
25 3 3 Exhibit 38 to Complaint: Richard Shenken letter regarding Zubalik family
26 3 3 Grievance Complaint filed by Kassab (No. 201801825) with attached exhibits including Walker, Seymour, and Ladner affidavits
27 3 3 Jacqueline Taylor sworn statement (attached to Complaint, connecting Porter/Chaney to PR Consultants)
28 3 3 Federal Court Lawsuit discovery documents showing PR Consultants diverted clients to other attorneys
29 5 5 Oral Videotaped Deposition of Michael A. Pohl, May 15, 2018, taken before Laurie Carlisle, CSR (Texas CSR 2205), at Shepherd Prewett offices, 770 South Post Oak Lane, Suite 420, Houston, Texas
30 5 5 Referenced 'private documents' Pohl obtained showing Favre paid $85,000 to Walker and Ladner (not attached)
31 5 5 Deposition taken in Cheatham v. Pohl, Cause No. 2017-41110, 55th Judicial District, Harris County
32 6 6 Exhibit 1 — Deposition of Jimmy Williamson
33 6 6 Exhibit 2 — Walker Memorandum Opinion (Doc. No. 475) from Mississippi federal court
34 6 6 Exhibit 3 — Affidavit of Scott Walker (with Exhibits 1 & 2: Operating Agreements)
35 6 6 Exhibit 4 — Affidavit of Steve Seymour (with Exhibit 2: Operating Agreement)
36 6 6 Exhibit 5 — Williamson and Pohl Power Point Advertisements
37 6 6 Exhibit 6 — May 2016 Affidavit of Scott Walker
38 6 6 Exhibit 7 — Deposition of Michael Pohl (pp. 51-52, 70)
39 6 6 Exhibit 8 — Maxwell Amended Verified Complaint
40 6 6 Exhibit 9 — Deposition of Scott Walker (pp. 73-76, 149, 200)
41 6 6 Exhibit 10 — Affidavit of Kirk Ladner
42 6 6 Exhibit 11 — Sworn Statement of Jacqueline Taylor
43 6 6 Exhibit 12 — Santana Affidavit (with Exhibits A, B, C)
44 6 6 Exhibit 13 — Walker First Amended Complaint
45 6 6 Exhibit 14 — Affidavit of Scott Favre
46 6 6 Exhibit 15 — Williamson Memorandum (Doc. No. 178)
47 6 6 Exhibit 16 — Pohl Memorandum (Doc. No. 175)
48 6 6 Exhibit 17 — Walker Order on Pohl and Williamson Motions to Dismiss (Doc. No. 252)
49 6 6 Exhibit 18 — Walker Order on Rusnak Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 273)
50 6 6 Exhibit 19 — Walker Judgment (Doc. No. 499)
51 6 6 Exhibits 20-22 — Emails showing Pohl directing runners to rollover accidents and fee calculations
52 6 6 Exhibit 23 — Runner instructions checklist
53 6 6 Exhibit 24 — Mark Cheatham solicitation documents
54 6 6 Exhibits 25-30 — Helping Hands contracts, limited power of attorney, vehicle purchase, Attorney Acknowledgment form, Funding Agreement
55 6 6 Exhibit 31 — Retention of Services Agreement (Pohl-Precision for Cheatham case, 30% of 40% contingency fee)
56 6 6 Exhibit 32 — Attorney-client contract between Pohl and Cheatham (signed Feb. 21, 2014)
57 6 6 Exhibit 33 — Talley compensation agreement ($10,000 per million recovered)
58 6 6 Exhibit 34 — Operating Agreement (Precision: 22.5% of LOMAP fees)
59 6 6 Exhibits 35-37 — Diaz/Curran and Sanchez fee calculations showing reverse-engineered hours to match percentage
60 6 6 Exhibit 38 — Richard Shenkan letter re: Ladner posing as GM Settlement Verification Team
61 6 6 Exhibit 39 — Pohl contract with Michael Lucas (subject of Shenkan letter)
62 6 6 Exhibit 40 — Hart family solicitation documents
63 6 6 Exhibits 41-42 — Additional rollover case runner agreements
64 6 6 Exhibit 43 — Fee-sharing contracts between Pohl, Williamson, and Rusnak (devoid of Rule 1.04 required language)
65 6 6 Exhibit 44 — S.B. 1716 Analysis
66 6 6 Exhibit 45 — S.B. 1716 text
67 6 6 Exhibit 46 — H.B. 1890 Analysis
68 6 6 Exhibit 47 — Tex. Gov't Code § 82.065 (2011 version)
69 6 6 Exhibit 48 — H.B. 1711 text
70 6 6 Exhibit 49 — H.B. 1711 Analysis
71 6 6 Exhibit 50 — Tex. Gov't Code § 82.0651 (2013 version)
72 6 6 July 3, 2018 Letter Exhibit 'A' — Transcribed conversation between Kassab and Santana
73 6 6 July 3, 2018 Letter Exhibit 'B' — Pohl's own affidavit admitting Walker/Ladner/Seymour were his 'representatives'
74 6 6 July 3, 2018 Letter Exhibit 'C' — Affidavit of Andrew Paul Mozingo (computer forensics expert) with Walker cell phone text messages
75 6 6 July 3, 2018 Letter Exhibit 'D' — Spreadsheet showing runner payments matched contract fee percentages
76 6 6 July 3, 2018 Letter Exhibits 'E' & 'F' — Documents showing Pohl contacted accident victims within days (Lacy Reese email; Mark Cheatham declaration)
77 6 6 July 3, 2018 Letter Exhibit 'G' — Deposition of Michael Pohl (pp. 44-46, 80-83, 87-93, 226-229, 271-273, 275)
78 6 6 Santana deposition (350+ pages) submitted with July 3 letter
79 6 6 Pohl's Reply dated July 17, 2018 (referenced in Kassab's July 20 response)
80 7 7 Exhibit 1 — Declaration of Lance Christopher Kassab
81 7 7 Exhibit 2 — Second Amended Petition filed in Walker v. Pohl (Mississippi federal litigation)
82 7 7 Exhibit 3 — Affidavit of Scott Walker dated April 29, 2017
83 7 7 Exhibit 4 — Scott Walker Deposition Excerpts (August 24, 2016)
84 7 7 Exhibit 5 — Scott Walker Deposition Excerpts (September 2018)
85 7 7 Exhibit 6 — Affidavit of Magdalena Santana dated September 24, 2016
86 7 7 Exhibit 7 — Edgar Jaimes Deposition Excerpts (June 26, 2018)
87 7 7 Exhibit 8 — Magdalena Santana Deposition Excerpts, Vol. I (November 8, 2016)
88 7 7 Exhibit 9 — Magdalena Santana Deposition Excerpts, Vol. II (November 8, 2016)
89 7 7 Exhibit 10 — Affidavit of Magdalena Santana dated December 19, 2017 (retraction affidavit)
90 7 7 Exhibit 11 — Kenneth Talley Deposition Excerpts (November 16, 2016)
91 7 7 Exhibit 12 — Walker Memorandum Opinion (Doc. No. 475) from Mississippi federal court
92 7 7 Exhibit 13 — Walker Pohl Memorandum (Doc. No. 175)
93 7 7 Exhibit 14 — Walker Order on Pohl Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 252)
94 7 7 Exhibit 15 — Walker Judgment (Doc. No. 499) — settlement dismissed with prejudice April 21, 2017
95 7 7 Exhibit 16 — State Bar Approvals of Kassab's advertisement letters
96 7 7 Exhibit 17 — Brumfield Third Amended Petition (Barratry Lawsuit)
97 7 7 Exhibit 18 — Gandy Third Amended Petition (Barratry Lawsuit)
98 7 7 Exhibit 19 — Berry Fifth Amended Petition (Barratry Lawsuit)
99 7 7 Exhibit 20 — Cheatham Fourth Amended Petition (Barratry Lawsuit)
100 7 7 Exhibit 21 — Grievance Pleadings filed against Pohl with the State Bar

Next page

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE evidence_referenced (
    evidence_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
    filing_id INTEGER REFERENCES filings(filing_id),
    evidence TEXT
);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 5.385ms · Data license: Public court records