filing_sections: 125
Data license: Public court records
This data as json
| section_id | filing_id | heading | summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 125 | 16 | B. Res Judicata | Kassab argues Pohl's claims are barred because: (1) the Federal Court Case resulted in a final judgment with prejudice on April 21, 2017; (2) Kassab is in privity with Precision as an alleged co-conspirator — conspirators are deemed in privity for res judicata purposes; (3) Pohl's claims here arise from the same subject matter discovered during the federal litigation. Pohl knew of the alleged sale to Kassab during the federal case but chose not to add Kassab as a party. Any cause of action arising out of the same facts should, if practicable, be litigated in the same lawsuit. |