filing_sections: 132
Data license: Public court records
This data as json
| section_id | filing_id | heading | summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 132 | 17 | II.B. Res Judicata Does Not Apply | Kassab was not a party to the Federal Court Case or the settlement agreement. He fails to establish privity under the controlling three-part Texas test (control, representation of interests, successor in interest). His reliance on out-of-state conspiracy-privity cases is misplaced. Precision itself did not move for summary judgment on res judicata grounds. Even if privity existed, the factual bases of the two actions differ — the Federal Counterclaim addressed improper billing, not theft of confidential information. |