filing_sections: 133
Data license: Public court records
This data as json
| section_id | filing_id | heading | summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 133 | 17 | II.B.1. Kassab Fails to Establish Privity | Texas rejects categorical privity approaches. Kassab must show (1) control over the prior action, (2) interests represented by a party, or (3) successor in interest. He provides no evidence on any test. Allegations of conspiracy alone are insufficient under Texas law — contrary to the out-of-state cases Kassab cites. Kassab cannot establish control because there is no evidence he openly participated in the Federal Court Case. He fails to prove Precision represented his interests. The successor-in-interest test is also unaddressed. |