filing_sections: 162
Data license: Public court records
This data as json
| section_id | filing_id | heading | summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 162 | 22 | Summary of Argument | Kassab's counterclaims fail because they are barred by res judicata (the same claims were previously adjudicated in Brumfield and Gandy cases), not revived by Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code ยง 16.069 and thus time-barred, and the purported assignments of the claims are invalid and unenforceable under Texas law as punitive statutory claims analogous to DTPA claims. |