filing_sections: 171
Data license: Public court records
This data as json
| section_id | filing_id | heading | summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 171 | 23 | Summary | Kassab argues the motion should be denied because res judicata does not apply due to changed facts and altered party relationships; Section 16.069 revives the barratry claims as counterclaims arising from the same transaction; and the Assignments are valid and not prohibited by the Disciplinary Rules or public policy. |