filing_sections: 175

553 document sections with headings and summaries

Data license: Public court records

This data as json

section_id	filing_id	heading	summary
175	23	B.1. Same transaction or occurrence — logical relationship test	Argues both claims arise from Precision's engagement to acquire clients for Pohl. Pohl's conversion/trade secret claims are based on Precision gaining access to confidential client information while 'liaising' with clients; Kassab's counterclaims allege the 'liaising' was actually illegal barratry. Both flow from the same relationship. Distinguishes Freeman (fishing rights vs. entire deed invalidity — not logically related) and T&C Construction (payments for separate jobs). Cites Quickel (breach of contract and defamation both arising from breakdown of employment relationship), Wells v. Dotson (flexible 'transaction' definition), Encore Enterprises (only 'some of the facts' need arise from same transaction), and Rahlek (deed construction and royalty unjust enrichment logically related despite time gap).