filing_sections: 177

553 document sections with headings and summaries

Data license: Public court records

This data as json

section_id	filing_id	heading	summary
177	23	B.3. Policy arguments fail	Distinguishes Ball v. SBC (which dealt with declaratory judgment not seeking affirmative relief — holding § 16.069 does not revive claims in pure declaratory judgment on limitations). Holman actually supports Kassab: it held that when a party seeks affirmative relief (not just a declaration), § 16.069 applies. Pohl seeks affirmative relief for conversion and trade secrets, not just a declaration. Ball's concerns about unjust results are not present.