filing_sections: 178

553 document sections with headings and summaries

Data license: Public court records

This data as json

section_id	filing_id	heading	summary
178	23	C.1. Judicial estoppel — Pohl should be estopped	Pohl argued to the Texas Supreme Court that the Assignments were valid: 'On its face, the documents assign any and all barratry claims [so] the Assignor retains no justiciable interest in the claims' — seeking dismissal of Brumfield and Gandy appeals. Yet argues here that Assignments are invalid. Cites Ferguson v. Bldg. Materials Corp. for judicial estoppel doctrine.