filing_sections: 182
Data license: Public court records
This data as json
| section_id | filing_id | heading | summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 182 | 24 | Introduction | Pohl argues that Kassab's Response effectively admits the Assignments were shams that altered nothing about claim ownership, were made explicitly to circumvent limitations, and that Kassab's Response fails to rebut any basis for summary judgment. Quotes Kassab's admission: 'Seeing Pohl's retaliatory suit as a means to potentially revive the barratry claims dismissed on limitations in Brumfield and Gandy, Kassab and his clients executed 242 Limited Assignments.' Notes that after 'assignment,' clients retained 60% and Kassab retained 40% contingency fee. |