filing_sections: 207
Data license: Public court records
This data as json
| section_id | filing_id | heading | summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 207 | 28 | III. Factual Background on Pohl's Claims | Pohl asserts four claims: breach of contract (not subject to Ch. 33), conversion, TUTSA violations, and conspiracy (derivative). The conversion harm is Defendants' 'unlawful taking' of Pohl's property (Burns v. Rochon). Each wrongful possession is a separate conversion (Pemex v. BASF). The TUTSA harm is unauthorized 'use' of Pohl's trade secrets — commercial use by which the offending party seeks to profit (Berry-Helfand). Multiple TUTSA harms: (1) Favre/Precision/Nicholson's sale of trade secrets to Kassab/Montague, and (2) Kassab/Montague's use of stolen secrets to bring lawsuits against Pohl. |