filing_sections: 233
Data license: Public court records
This data as json
| section_id | filing_id | heading | summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 233 | 30 | Argument E — Conclusive Negation (No Ownership) | Client files are property of clients, not attorney (In re McCann, In re George, Thomson v. Findlater). Attorney must surrender client property (Rule 1.15). Marketing lists belonged to Precision as its own work product (Favre testimony). Pohl does not own the purported trade secrets or property. TUTSA requires claimant to show ownership (Title Source v. HouseCanary; § 134A.002(3-a)). Conversion requires title or right to possession (Catania). Because Pohl lacks ownership, TUTSA, conversion, and derivative conspiracy claims all fail (Trammel Crow). |