filing_sections: 258
Data license: Public court records
This data as json
| section_id | filing_id | heading | summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 258 | 34 | General Objection | Pohl inappropriately suggests all barratry suits were resolved on the merits. The Berry case settled (suggesting merit). The Cheatham case was reversed on appeal with fact issues on barratry. Brumfield and Gandy were dismissed on limitations, not the merits. An affirmative defense bars recovery even if plaintiff's claims are true (Man Engines v. Shows). None of the barratry suits have been adjudicated on the merits, and neither has the issue of whether Pohl committed barratry. Kassab incorporates all evidence and argument from his August 29, 2022 MSJ, the Nicholson MSJ, and Nicholson's response. |