filing_sections: 267

553 document sections with headings and summaries

Data license: Public court records

This data as json

section_id	filing_id	heading	summary
267	35	II.B. Conversion Evidence	Elements established: (1) Ownership — Pohl testified he owns his computers, contracts, data, client files, work product, financial information; Walker, Ladner, and Seymour all testified client contracts/lists belong to Pohl; even if Pohl lacks legal title, evidence raises fact issue on superior right of possession (French v. Moore). (2) Unauthorized dominion — no dispute defendants obtained Pohl's contracts, communications, and client lists without permission; they used materials to file suits and grievances. (3) Demand and refusal — Pohl contends demand not legally required where defendants wrongfully acquired possession (Guillory v. Dietrich); regardless, Pohl's counsel Billy Shepherd made multiple demands for return; Pohl sought federal court sanctions for failure to return; Nicholson admitted in her MSJ that settlement required return of trade secrets. (4) Damages — owner is competent to testify on value (Wiese v. Pro Am Services); additional sources include Favre's $1.5 million purchase of Precision, Favre's affidavit on value, defendants' $250,000 payment, and attorneys' fees from defending barratry litigation.