filing_sections: 278
Data license: Public court records
This data as json
| section_id | filing_id | heading | summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 278 | 36 | F. TUTSA Protection of Trade Secrets | Nicholson's argument that absence of confidentiality provision 'conclusively negates' TUTSA claim fails. TUTSA requires only 'reasonable measures under the circumstances.' Must consider special nature of attorney-client relationship and ability to share with 'lawyer representatives' under Rule 503. Pohl took extensive steps: informed Precision of confidential nature, office at top of Hancock Bank with 24-hour security, coded elevators, security cameras, files under lock and key, clearly labeled engagement agreements. Mississippi court issued protective orders: Oct. 14, 2016 order required strict confidentiality protections on client information; March 22, 2017 protective order defined 'Confidential Information' to include client names, addresses, telephone numbers with strict protections. Limited production in Mississippi went between parties who already had the information. |