filing_sections: 292

553 document sections with headings and summaries

Data license: Public court records

This data as json

section_id	filing_id	heading	summary
292	40	Objections to Pohl Declaration (Traditional MSJ Response)	Defendants object to approximately 20 paragraphs/statements in Pohl's September 12, 2022 declaration on grounds of: conclusory statements, hearsay, improper lay/expert opinion on legal issues (trade secret status, ownership, possessory interest), vagueness about who at 'Precision' made representations, failure to meet 'clear, positive and direct' standard for interested-witness testimony under Rule 166a(c), and belief statements not constituting competent evidence. Key targeted paragraphs: ¶4 (shared office with contractors), ¶6 (Mississippi attorney review), ¶¶10-11 (Precision representations), ¶12 (ownership/trade secret claims), ¶13 (client list compilation), ¶14 (confidentiality instructions), ¶15 (security measures), ¶16 (denial of barratry), ¶17 (unauthorized practice), ¶18 (fee-sharing denial), ¶20 (attorney consultation), ¶¶21-22 (Precision services), ¶23 (Precision stealing), ¶¶24-25 (theft of property), ¶26 (sanctions), ¶27 (economic value), ¶28 (damages), ¶¶29-30 (no barratry), ¶31 (unawareness of sale), ¶32 (grievance allegations).